Post B2c8P36SjqTcquh6HY by 32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245@mostr.pub
 (DIR) More posts by 32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245@mostr.pub
 (DIR) Post #B2c8P36SjqTcquh6HY by 32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245@mostr.pub
       2026-01-24T14:57:54.000Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       vibe coding is too binary of a term and is causing confusion.The way I’m starting to look at it is agentic coding with different levels of human-in-the-loop.Sometimes you want to be in the loop (pair/symbiotic programming) sometimes you don’t (vibe coding)vibe coding isn’t necessarily bad, its just bad for certain problems: ones where you should be in the loop.And yes i still think humans should still be in the loop. For now.