Post B2aa8qtukQHEm4yCxc by mitch@podcastindex.social
 (DIR) More posts by mitch@podcastindex.social
 (DIR) Post #B2aa8qtukQHEm4yCxc by mitch@podcastindex.social
       2026-01-23T21:28:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       As the Podverse infrastructure has grown to 10+ repos, and given how LLM seems to perform better with all its context in one place, and it would be easier to save llm prompt history in one place...I'm wondering if we should make a major switch to a monorepo 😣I've never done a monorepo before. If it were just LLM, then we may not need it (we could create yet another repo...podverse-llm or something) (cont)
       
 (DIR) Post #B2aa8rvMwV2Dwsesro by mitch@podcastindex.social
       2026-01-23T21:30:47Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       but I'm also thinking it may be easier for open source contributors to create PRs for Podverse if they can just create 1 PR per feature. Right now, a typical feature update will require changes to multiple repos. It's a clean process imo, but it does add significant overhead to PR creation and reviews.Anyone have experience and opinions on monorepos? Worth the switch in our case, or could it create more problems than it is worth?