Post B2Ng6xYVNzzPlhPKOO by jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
 (DIR) More posts by jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
 (DIR) Post #B2MJ7EWZnuMEIChtMe by silverpill@mitra.social
       2026-01-17T00:13:11.941457Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @julian There are several dozens of actively maintained ActivityPub implementations, I think it is not difficult to find two implementers among them, especially if they will be paid to implement a proposed change / extension (as we have seen with the E2EE proposal).@slyborg @evan @connected-places @fediversereport @ArneBab @alexchapman
       
 (DIR) Post #B2Ng6xYVNzzPlhPKOO by jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
       2026-01-17T01:33:08Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @silverpill In a hilarious twist of fate, this gives (streams) and Forte an unfair advantage. They're nearly identical, they have the same maintainer, but they're two separate implementations, also seeing as Forte uses ActivityPub for nomadic identity, and (streams) doesn't and still uses its own Nomad protocol for it.Since Mitra appears to implement (streams)/Forte features one by one and cast them into FEPs, that's three implementations already. Two if nomadic identity via ActivityPub is involved. And if Hubzilla happens to have it, too, we've got up to four implementations.Yes, ActivityPub is only an optional add-on on Hubzilla and (streams), but an implementation is an implementation. And whatever they do on Nomad that federates has to get out through ActivityPub one way or another.It'd be even more hilariously skewed, hadn't Mike discontinued the five apps between Hubzilla and (streams) on New Year's Eve 2022.CC: @slyborg @Evan Prodromou @Connected Places @ArneBab @Alex Chapman#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #ActivityPub #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mitra
       
 (DIR) Post #B2Ng6yWPnFualVRAm0 by silverpill@mitra.social
       2026-01-17T16:05:43.936579Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jupiter_rowland The two-implementation requirement sounds totally inadequate to me. Does it really work like that?I think nothing new should ever be added to the core spec unless it is supported by 51% of implementers.@fediversereport @alexchapman @ArneBab @evan @slyborg