Post B2A00LbeqT4JChZFvU by c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5@mostr.pub
 (DIR) More posts by c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5@mostr.pub
 (DIR) Post #B2A00HnZ0GDPOT6hvc by d5415a313d38461ff93a8c170f941b2cd4a66a5cfdbb093406960f6cb317849f@mostr.pub
       2026-01-10T18:24:56.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The scary problem is…America was founded by a diverse people, but with shared principles. First in human history (at least of this scale).But when you then have a diverse people revert back to tribal associations separate from shared principles…how does this nation stay “united”?It doesn’t. It falls.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2A00JSMq2RsXJCoAS by c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5@mostr.pub
       2026-01-10T21:36:37.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Your understanding is fundamentally flawed if you think "diversity" in the modern sense was a founding principle of America. One of the very first laws passed by the First Congress, whose members included many of the Founders, and signed by none other than George Washington, was the Naturalization Act of 1790, which stated that only people of European descent could become citizens of the United States.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2A00KeSOZiIF5ryeO by b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78@mostr.pub
       2026-01-10T21:56:15.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       People from european origins are still imigrants.Are you claiming, that the USA is racist and humiliating based on origin by design? So you would consider it unamerican, when someone lifes, works, parties or otherwise interacts with people that are non-europeans?
       
 (DIR) Post #B2A00LbeqT4JChZFvU by c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5@mostr.pub
       2026-01-10T22:06:57.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Every race needs exclusive territory of its own if it is to survive. It's not hateful or wrong even in the slightest degree to secure such territory.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2A00MLk57vpVd83l2 by d5415a313d38461ff93a8c170f941b2cd4a66a5cfdbb093406960f6cb317849f@mostr.pub
       2026-01-10T22:23:10.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Oh boy. I disagree with you, but also I wasn’t even talking about racial diversity. That’s a part of it, but also religion diversity as well. Under a common principles understanding.  There was great diversity at the time from even Europeans here…and your mentioning a naturalization law from people who did not have women or slaves as voting members of society at the time of course. We can take the spirit of the founders in this case…these things have updated of course
       
 (DIR) Post #B2A00NF2lWASH90DxI by c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5@mostr.pub
       2026-01-10T22:39:06.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I think the spirit of the Founders can be fairly summarized as follows: They wanted a Whites-only meritocracy. As for religion, with a few exceptions, they didn't want the new government interfering with it.