Post B1eC0YQdTYO6JHFA4e by manfromhuh@dsmc.space
 (DIR) More posts by manfromhuh@dsmc.space
 (DIR) Post #B1eBX7gTpdg8xvcXtg by icedquinn@blob.cat
       2025-12-26T17:22:48.004617Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       > disabling accounts mid-firing is indicative of evidence destruction:blobcatwaitwhat: ... is that true
       
 (DIR) Post #B1eC0YQdTYO6JHFA4e by manfromhuh@dsmc.space
       2025-12-26T17:28:08.580762Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @icedquinn Deleting the account maybe. But disabling is just a basic security measure.
       
 (DIR) Post #B1eC5bm4SoVs8OgCRM by icedquinn@blob.cat
       2025-12-26T17:29:02.318796Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @manfromhuh disabling it eventually certainly is. the :gutkato_roboto: was opining that disabling it -in the middle of the call to terminate them- is desperate and indicative of premeditation
       
 (DIR) Post #B1eElnTvWgSKVzRCiG by manfromhuh@dsmc.space
       2025-12-26T17:59:05.585923Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @icedquinn People usually are premeditated when firing someone. I'm confused.
       
 (DIR) Post #B1eFAmXi9cs6qI7bAO by icedquinn@blob.cat
       2025-12-26T18:03:35.149223Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @manfromhuh not quite. the decisions are made, HR goes through rigemerole, tickets get made and IT gets around to it. this process doesn't happen in lockstep unless they are desperate.
       
 (DIR) Post #B1eGG7iiwZOPvSNqT2 by manfromhuh@dsmc.space
       2025-12-26T18:15:45.720904Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @icedquinn In the organizations I've been a part of it usually is _very_ lockstep. But maybe that's not as common as I think.