Post B0yPi9HPD853LnyKrA by b9AcE@todon.eu
 (DIR) More posts by b9AcE@todon.eu
 (DIR) Post #B0yPi9HPD853LnyKrA by b9AcE@todon.eu
       2025-12-06T11:57:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       "25 States Now Require Your Government ID Online",the latest video by @techlore,with the additional description "Age verification laws in 25 USA states now require government ID to access parts of the internet—but they're already backfiring. Learn how these regulations harm real people, while failing to protect children. Plus: what you can do about it." https://techlore.tv/w/hF76f1sstH3eermJg6Avp7 is of course extremely important, a direct threat to the actual free speech in the specific form intended to be protected by the First Amendment, while also a mandatory threat to the people's personal security and privacy.Also struck me as another demonstration of the false party-propaganda regarding which party stands for which values, as the Republican party poses itself as the party for individual freedom, right to decide how to raise one's own children, rugged self-reliance, etc,but in this example of ultimate freedom importance ALL states are entirely ruled by the Republican party, except AZ, KS, KY and NC having Democrat governors but Republicans holding both chambers, and VA with a Republican party Governor but Democrat party (just barely) majority in both chambers.So, that's 20 entirely Republican to 5 somewhat divided.Maybe an angle for those who decide to contact politicians who imposed this violation.
       
 (DIR) Post #B0yPiAfC4Ahdds6qZc by divVerent@social.vivaldi.net
       2025-12-06T13:43:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @b9AcE @techlore Oddly enough, the same Republicans would be appalled if anyone suggested a similar age gate with showing government IDs on online shops where one can buy certain 18+ items such as firearms and ammunition.Odd, isn't it?
       
 (DIR) Post #B0yQTET1k2nN38rKjI by b9AcE@todon.eu
       2025-12-06T13:52:15Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @divVerent Yes, the people must be restricted from speaking freely with each other which may lead to or take the form of protests against politicians, but the people must be enabled to with maximized ease murder each other, including politicians, freely. Odd, it is.Depends on who https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wurST5gGdNE bought the politicians, hmm?@techlore