Post B0P84ZVwCFFMcCefZY by gmassen@mastodon.opencloud.lu
 (DIR) More posts by gmassen@mastodon.opencloud.lu
 (DIR) Post #B0OvKLMhGsTfxhWU64 by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
       2025-11-19T10:48:16Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       If you write slides/articles explaining #DNS resolution and showing queries from resolvers to authoritative name servers, do you use QNAME minimisation or not?
       
 (DIR) Post #B0P84ZVwCFFMcCefZY by gmassen@mastodon.opencloud.lu
       2025-11-19T13:11:08Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer 4th option: I forgot.
       
 (DIR) Post #B0R13vqxc3jIuzKziq by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
       2025-11-20T11:02:01Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @drscriptt One of the things that led to QNAME minimisation was the fact that many beginners thought DNS worked that way since it seemed, to them, more logical.So, I challenge the idea that the traditional way is simpler to understand.
       
 (DIR) Post #B0R7r08f4FcK7kOkjY by gjherbiet@mamot.fr
       2025-11-20T12:18:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer Checked my own "#DNS 101" slide deck: I use "the old way"…but later introduces QNAME minimisation and presents a modified version of the slide with minimisation enabled.So I shall probably vote "Covfefe" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯