Post AzhlOzUEApPwDynAcC by betalars@chaos.social
 (DIR) More posts by betalars@chaos.social
 (DIR) Post #AzhOr2uejLyg0tYw52 by SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
       2025-10-29T10:51:54.675Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @solonovamax@tech.lgbt I have nothing against the technology, but I hate what people decide to use it for.We need free (libre) AI now. So that the technology serves our interests and not the interests of the big tech companies.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzhlOzUEApPwDynAcC by betalars@chaos.social
       2025-10-29T14:43:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @SuperDicq I used to be on that side of the argument as well, but not so much anymore.There are many open Source models out there but fundamental ethical and technological issues remain.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzhlP0X6HdJFTB8yjQ by SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
       2025-10-29T15:04:36.289Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @betalars@chaos.social I wasn't talking about open source. The Open Source Initiative has its own definition of what constitutes "open source" AI models that I disagree with.I said "free (libre)", with which I mean freedom as defined by the Free Software Foundation.They are still working on their own definition of what constitutes ethical AI, which is unfortunately not done yet. But I like where it is heading and I would consider this fine to use.