Post AzgcT23fSdeAc4GGDQ by prlzx@hostux.social
 (DIR) More posts by prlzx@hostux.social
 (DIR) Post #AzgTKbK258drmwowU4 by BrodieOnLinux@mstdn.social
       2025-10-29T00:07:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Slow down, the hallucination engine can't handle much more than this https://x.com/grok/status/1983157810633551956
       
 (DIR) Post #AzgWtV9dIyFMepI1ku by progo@boop.city
       2025-10-29T00:47:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @BrodieOnLinux I read a page on Grokipedia. I don't care what Musk says. The page has no license on it. Therefore all rights reserved.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzgYLq6n5izPhy2LRI by prlzx@hostux.social
       2025-10-29T01:03:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @BrodieOnLinux Off the top of my head this was the first question I went with for GrokipediaThe first page of results fails to answer the question and instead suggests unrelated questions.Gemini for comparison correctly answered with info about a mole as the SI unit (symbol "mol").But it likely quotes from the Wikipedia summary anyway.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzgZ8Fs2byvXVYDxEO by apropos
       2025-10-29T01:12:29.575438Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @prlzx @BrodieOnLinux it's not an AI search engine prompt. The AI's in the page results.https://grokipedia.com/page/Mole_(unit) says at the bottom that it's adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mole_(unit) and the content is very similar, yes, but also this isn't politically sensitive at all so there's no reason for Wikipedia's content to have degraded and need alternation.What I suggested was for an AI to mine the entire edit history of Wikipedia and produce the final page from it, using prompted editorializing of the submitted content ("give me right-wing results", "give me widely added but always reverted results", "give me additions using these sources:"), instead of relying on Wikipedia's hopelessly corrupted system.grokipedia.png
       
 (DIR) Post #AzgbifSl8aRXDKtCfw by prlzx@hostux.social
       2025-10-29T01:41:22Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @aproposYeah, but then what is the point in marketing something as an AI-powered improvement on Wikipedia, when it cannot even handle natural language queries (not even AI) that could be used with search engines available in the 90s?Also it clearly made no attempt filter or order "10,000 results" into something vaguely useful.Perhaps you weren't on the web in the 90s pre-Google to have used AltaVista, Lycos, Infoseek, Ask Jeeves, Excite or the DMOZ though to know how poor this looks.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzgcT23fSdeAc4GGDQ by prlzx@hostux.social
       2025-10-29T01:49:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @apropos I mean it quite literally failed to filter out the words "what" "is "a" "in" to limit itself to keywords.
       
 (DIR) Post #Azgja5rSQ2OW78rdlA by dutch_connection_uk@mastodo.neoliber.al
       2025-10-29T03:09:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @BrodieOnLinux Grok praising Elon? He really lobotomized it.