Post AzV8zX2wYFinUhn3cO by filippo@abyssdomain.expert
 (DIR) More posts by filippo@abyssdomain.expert
 (DIR) Post #AzV8zX2wYFinUhn3cO by filippo@abyssdomain.expert
       2025-10-23T12:34:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Serious take: the solution to Safe Browsing false positives like the Immich one is passkeys.Phishing regularly upends people's lives. The Safe Browsing cat-and-mouse with all its opaque false positives will be necessary until we roll out phishing-resistant auth.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzV8zYJdpeflQmbuHg by whitequark@mastodon.social
       2025-10-23T12:39:53Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @filippo I'm sure you know this already, but I really wish the messaging around passkeys was less... bullshitI've been a happy user for many months and have zero qualms (other than "the outdated version of android i self-sign doesn't do them cross-app" but this one is a rather self-inflicted problem), whereas basically everyone i engage in a dialogue with thinks passkeys are something they're not and something they're certain of they can't use even if they wanted
       
 (DIR) Post #AzV8zZri4TWCEjYd1c by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
       2025-10-23T12:57:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark@filippo IMO the messaging around passkeys gives off very strong vendor lock-in vibes.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzV9Bu2QtW3EHERyoC by whitequark@mastodon.social
       2025-10-23T12:59:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wolf480pl @filippo it would seem so; my conclusion is that's probably less "intentional" and more because "the vendors in question haven't been taxed properly in forever, sit on giant piles of rent cash, and forgot how to do anything but rent-seeking institutionally"
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVEQlwrkncdIkkwXg by filippo@abyssdomain.expert
       2025-10-23T13:58:37Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wolf480pl @whitequark to this day I do not understand the lock-in argument: just register two passkeys if you're worried! Or do a password/passkey reset if you lose access. These are both not super user friendly options, but neither is exporting passwords from a password manager?
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVFRGN2kEQNbmnYBs by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
       2025-10-23T14:09:56Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @untitaker@filippo @whitequark Doesn't the import/export work only between instances of the same app, with some cryptographic handshake between them?
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVFyyCKohhT5nrVfE by whitequark@mastodon.social
       2025-10-23T14:02:58Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @filippo @wolf480pl IMO the lock-in argument is wrong because you can "simply use KeepassXC" which is what i've been doing for 15 years now. I didn't want Google to have my passwords and it doesn't; I don't want it to have my passkeys (certainly not after a Google Authenticator update fucking _erased all of the TOTP codes_, how this passed any QA is beyond me) and it doesn't
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVFyzXznecZHH0K48 by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
       2025-10-23T14:16:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @whitequark@filippo what if passage but for passkeys?
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVNQ6Q13mK05Q98HA by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
       2025-10-23T15:39:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @untitaker@filippo  I think in the long run it'd be nice if all those websites could provide a standardized API so that you could rotate your passwords / passkeys / etc on all websites from within your password manager. That could then also be used to migrate to a different password manager.But until then, I agree export is the only viable option. @whitequark mentioned KeePass has that, so there's one option at least.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVfuDaEmfVoAcRAAa by filippo@abyssdomain.expert
       2025-10-23T16:56:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @untitaker @wolf480pl @whitequark serious question: how many users do you think ever bulk exported passwords from a password manager, as a proportion of all users that ever used a password?IMHO, bulk export is a niche use case, and per-site migration is solved by "add another passkey" or "reset flow".
       
 (DIR) Post #AzVfuEyNcOPyTmjxRI by whitequark@mastodon.social
       2025-10-23T16:58:05Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @filippo @untitaker @wolf480pl I disagree that this is a valid way to judge the feature. "bulk export" is primarily an _emergency_ feature: used only when the vendor of the password manager is, or is close to becoming, untrustworthy.saying "well only 0.0x% of users ever used Google Takeout, so it is a niche feature, and anyway you should go and download every of your documents one by one in that case" is missing the point
       
 (DIR) Post #AzViTEe11zZzVL1tKb by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
       2025-10-23T19:35:15Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @growse @whitequark @filippo @untitaker You can only choose an implementation if it's impossible for the relying party to figure out which implementation you chose.As soon as the RP can see what implementation you're choosing, they can force you to choose a particular one that aligns with their threat model or their economic interest.
       
 (DIR) Post #AzWj2U280AU0Wf4jzM by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
       2025-10-24T07:16:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @filippohow do you do per-site migration on 200+ websites at once?@untitaker @whitequark