Post AzAV4kbxfAbxgVu9uS by amerika@annihilation.social
(DIR) More posts by amerika@annihilation.social
(DIR) Post #AzA8VI1lkMp1uHf6MC by MuhRamblings@www.minds.com
2025-10-13T03:38:54+00:00
1 likes, 1 repeats
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1824315607116537856
(DIR) Post #AzA8bZVJgMatqZTgv2 by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T09:43:18.491834Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@MuhRamblings The future is literally men renting wombs and paying for child-rearing for 18 years. Marriage is dead. Even relationships are dead. Casual sex is also dead. Individualism/liberation/enlightenment killed another thing.
(DIR) Post #AzA8gyihMFLjV5Jbmq by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T09:44:31.758394Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@MuhRamblings Gestational and childcare contracts are the future:https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/family-code/fam-sect-160-754/
(DIR) Post #AzA9ls6rShkiOvVxhI by 5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326@mostr.pub
2025-10-13T09:53:28.000Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
If you think this was caused by the enlightenment, then that’s your first missed point and the one that conceals all others.The enlightenment is why “freedom” and “human rights” are the calling cards they use. But notice that they don’t give a damn about freedom when it’s convenient, or human rights if you’re the wrong race/sex?It is metaphysical dualism.Why can woman “do anything men can do”? Because we are “spiritually the same”. How can men be “women actually? Because one’s spirit is totally independent of one’s body. It’s a female spirit trapped in a man’s body.How then can men and women properly coexist while denying what they actually ARE, let alone acknowledging the nature of the other?The answer is that they don’t.The same philosophy that will destroy farmers livelihoods but still expect to have food… destroys gender based protections in marriage… but here’s the dirty secret… they DON’T expect you to get/stay married. They just need you to have one kid first before it all blows up so they can extort the maximum amount of money out of you.But that’s not Aristotle or Locke talking when that happens. That’s Kant and Marx.Marriage still works for those who aren’t denying basic nature. The problem is that you have no legal protections anymore, as those processes have been weaponized against their original purpose. But marriage works. I’m married with 3 kids.
(DIR) Post #AzA9ltWQD9nCmUTtB2 by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T09:56:21.569533Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326 @MuhRamblings 1. I don't believe any biographical details shared on the open internet. Maybe you're a brain surgeon, probably not though.2. Metaphysical dualism = Heaven/Earth dichotomy. This leads to Enlightenment thinking, i.e. moral right > function.3. Avoid marriage and you avoid being manipulated by others. Civil rights law makes that a necessity.
(DIR) Post #AzAOoV3d7laB5TiM0O by 5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326@mostr.pub
2025-10-13T12:23:40.000Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
1) I literally have videos and a podcast with my kids. At a certain point, evidence is there. Even if not me, others are still making it work.2) metaphysical dualism is heaven and earth. But you are wrong in assuming it is where moral right thinking comes from exclusively. You are denying the Aristotelian lineage wherein moral right = function. That is because Aristotle brought the “forms” to earth (essences), thereby bringing the principles that make up the moral right to the things on the earth they pertain to. This current was then introduced into the enlightenment by Thomas acquinas. So while this was tied up with Christianity, it is also distinct and led to deism and randianism that can acknowledge that morality is derived from the facts of the REAL world.But I admit that this distinction, alone, can be a long article in and of itself3) civil rights law did fuck up the west, agreed. But avoiding being a parent and making healthy families also cedes the ground to the nut jobs. Ideas survive when people have children raised in them. Gen Z is slanting conservatives for no other reason than conservatives being the most likely to have children: even with schools and other institutions all getting more rabid and insane.Not having children is a “check out” that only makes the problem worse.
(DIR) Post #AzAOoWeBDMPg17p3c8 by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T12:44:05.943383Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326 @MuhRamblings 2. The idea of morality itself came from dualism. Aristotle and Redbeard tried to tie it to function, but ultimately it is human wishful thinking. Their actions were an attempt to fix dualism not the origin of it.3. Future tax slaves can be raised with gestational contracts. Avoids the horrors of dating, marriage, casual sex, and ordinary families which are usually psychologically abusive.
(DIR) Post #AzARz99tBUrWDUPVR2 by 5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326@mostr.pub
2025-10-13T13:08:21.000Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
2) Morality has been around since time immamorial. OBJECTIVE morality, you could attribute to dualism. But even the most savage tribes you could name have social norms of their own and could give you reasons for those norms. The sum of the norms and their reasons is a code of morality, however primitive.Even the Muslim invaders in the west have moral norms, and specific terms for them. But, rather than them being truly universal and objective, they are tribal. https://image.nostr.build/1e552c5d1767a161a196a5f60f506398c19120ac2076a1b1fc544447753b1333.jpgAll your posts imply an underlying morality. The virtue of honesty and adherence to truth is a moral virtue. In a corrupted society, wouldnt it be more pragmatic to tow the line and lie to get one over on everyone, like the worst Indian scammer?That’s their code. But I know you don’t accept it. You’re right not to. But you’re wrong to dispense with morality altogether because some moral systems are disgusting. It is the equivalent of dispensing with history because we wuzzers try their best to rewrite it.3) children are the literal meaning of life, spiritually and evolutionarily. Evil systems abusing them doesn’t rewrite the underlying reality that every good thing about what you and I are exists because our parents chose to make us. And those things will only CONTINUE to exist so long as people have children to perpetuate those things, be they genetic, cultural, or institutional.Again, abusive families do not get to dictate the meaning of what families are any more than we wuzzers get to dictate the meaning of history.
(DIR) Post #AzARzANOelGFzfjo80 by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T13:21:20.334745Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326 @MuhRamblings 2. Before dualism, we did not have morality; we had social standards and we followed them in order to be coherent with the group, not from fear of good/evil right/wrong. What the group did was appropriate. It was a more "Might is Right" time than the outpouring of the Abrahamic religions.
(DIR) Post #AzAV4jhb2jWarhX93Q by 5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326@mostr.pub
2025-10-13T13:34:44.000Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Your error here is totally disassociating the two, as if social standards arent rooted in reality.Why is it that nearly every society has something approximating marriage? And murder laws? And borders?Because even the most savage people that exist are people. And people have requirements in order to live, and additional requirements to do so amongst other people.An excerpt from starship troopers, chapter 8, for your considerationhttps://image.nostr.build/86eb94f148a9bab24f9a370914ab5c101f1ab66feb29671b41a606ca735dd34a.jpg
(DIR) Post #AzAV4kbxfAbxgVu9uS by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T13:56:13.722387Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326 @MuhRamblings The distinction is this: standards are rooted in reality, but morality is not, since it is based on human judgments on a personal level rather than culture.When someone fucks up a cultural standard, we do not say they are evil, generally.... but we view them as not right in the head or idiotic and want them gone.
(DIR) Post #AzAY48X5XQFNRs1Z56 by 5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326@mostr.pub
2025-10-13T14:13:02.000Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
I say the distinction is only on the quality of the cultural standard.Just as some cultures are smarter than others, just as some theories of [pick your discipline] are more accurate to the facts, some cultures are more accurate to the rules of reality than others.There is only a distinction between norms and morality when norms are unjust: I.e., flaut reality.When a norm steals from the productive and gives to the unproductive, but continues to expect the productive to keep producing: that is an immoral norm. It offers rhe productive punishment for the act of performing the productive work that keeps the freeloaders alive. It is the morality of parasites that don’t care if they kill the host and extinct themselves along with him in the process. It is a cult of death.Morality is your set of standards. Your standards are based on the existence of human life. All just standards start with your own life, then expand to people that matter more to you—both those who are genetically closer to you (family, ethnic groups, race, etc) and those only connected to you by values/interests (friends, allies, business partners, etc)—and extent to the limits of that which conflicts with the values of the inner core (yourself and your closest associates).There is one set of universal standards that applies to all humans by the nature of those common traits that we all share. There is another set of standards that only apply to specific people due to specific traits they do NOT share with others.Because ALL morality starts acknowledgement of reality.
(DIR) Post #AzAY49LQWGVrxzZlXk by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T14:29:32.264529Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326 @MuhRamblings Culture is genetic. This explains the differences.However, cultural standards are not morality. They are behavior codes.Morality is what comes in when you do not have that; it is basically a control mechanism that judges you in terms of legitimacy as a person, not judges your actions and ejects you for being an unsuitable fit.
(DIR) Post #AzAcY9h0Bp6JYAEN84 by 5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326@mostr.pub
2025-10-13T15:12:38.000Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
White culture included moral codes. Just because they have some elements of genetic influence doesn’t change that fact. If anything, white culture CREATING “liberating” cultures actually defeats your assertion about morality just being control.“A man is a king in his own castle” is a cultural principle that also sets a moral parameter: “his house/his rules”. It means that you (or someone else) doesn’t have a right to defile or disrespect another man’s property.
(DIR) Post #AzAcahw1qf0AKWTbUG by amerika@annihilation.social
2025-10-13T15:20:18.000773Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@5e759c2ca4a4e222ba7af89e6ff315e1d27843fe8bd0a3e7e61e4ba5b1c07326 @MuhRamblings These are cultural mores, not morality. Morality judges good/bad; mores judge fits/not-fits.