Post AyOqZVBX22WIr1LL9s by nathan@xoxo.zone
 (DIR) More posts by nathan@xoxo.zone
 (DIR) Post #AyN4xrWUdoNG7ujoZ6 by james@bne.social
       2025-09-19T17:00:06Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       One for podcasting2.0 people - Adopter Media are looking for a “majority AI” disclosure for podcasts, and it would be great if we built this into a tag. Is anyone interested in working on that and helping them?Boosts welcome from@dave @adam
       
 (DIR) Post #AyNoYvPVe9uMppWCMi by nathan@xoxo.zone
       2025-09-19T18:39:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @james I’m not convinced this is a problem that can be solved by a new tag. Advertisers are the aggrieved party here, and I’d expect they would like to opt out of more than just the self-disclosed AI slop.
       
 (DIR) Post #AyNoYwcJA3jwZoVvxA by james@bne.social
       2025-09-20T01:52:18Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @nathan Look, agreed. But right now there is no way of programmatically spotting AI-majority content. A tag might at least help, even if it’s self-disclosed. <podcast:aicontent>100</podcast:aicontent>… where the number is the percentage of AI content in the episode. 100=no human involvement?
       
 (DIR) Post #AyNoYxcLRPMbgDXTeK by dave@podcastindex.social
       2025-09-20T02:13:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @james @nathan I’m totally willing to help develop this even if we all know it will be of dubious usefulness. I think we had a previous proposal for such a tag. But I guess the main thing is if it needs to be a full, dedicated tag or something more like the <podcast:txt> tag with an “ai” purpose. We all remember the raw voice namespace that is littered with references to old things that were a thing who’s time passed.
       
 (DIR) Post #AyNvWshvQORNYH6Yhk by nathan@xoxo.zone
       2025-09-20T03:31:46Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dave @james Here’s that proposal: https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/discussions/663
       
 (DIR) Post #AyOjVZtKtMJec70vnE by dave@podcastindex.social
       2025-09-20T12:51:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @nathan @james Thanks brother.
       
 (DIR) Post #AyOkLK7QmNjCkoHU92 by dave@podcastindex.social
       2025-09-20T13:01:09Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @nathan @james I think the goal with this would be to make something (if possible) that doesn't make publishers automatically think that tagging as AI == banning.  Then they'll never use it.  I think this proposal is heading in a good direction on that front.  Gonna let it stew in my mind and see if any light bulbs happen.James, do you want to send the link to Nathan's proposal to the people you mentioned so they can also weigh in as well?  Whatever you think is best.
       
 (DIR) Post #AyOqZVBX22WIr1LL9s by nathan@xoxo.zone
       2025-09-20T14:10:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dave @james I never revised the proposal after Sam and Todd’s comments, but I like the idea of just extending the person tag to indicate a synthetic voice. I’ll start a new discussion on GitHub