Post Ax4ADXBedZIvQKfxXU by chrisjrn@social.coop
 (DIR) More posts by chrisjrn@social.coop
 (DIR) Post #Ax4ADXBedZIvQKfxXU by chrisjrn@social.coop
       2025-08-11T16:02:12Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       It's not that LLMs are bad, per se*, it's that most Product people are mediocre (true, by definition, of most people doing most things) and therefore cannot operate at the intersection of "things that an LLM can do well" and "things that deterministic computing cannot do well".This naturally results in "what if thing that computer can already do, but LLM?"https://fosstodon.org/@anuytstt/115009836366326911
       
 (DIR) Post #Ax4ADf21TGLxkmENdY by chrisjrn@social.coop
       2025-08-11T16:06:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       * this "per se" is, of course, extremely load-bearing (copyrights, systemic biases, etc etc etc); I'm making a point about suitability for purpose, which we haven't even got to yet.