Post Awf0N4WoBjpswUTul6 by sandlotus@www.minds.com
 (DIR) More posts by sandlotus@www.minds.com
 (DIR) Post #AwZguXijmbr7WAqlSy by sickburnbro@poa.st
       2025-07-28T00:00:21.376924Z
       
       3 likes, 2 repeats
       
       good to see they've removed CO2 from the list of pollutants. It was absurd when they did it, and hasn't gotten any less stupid.
       
 (DIR) Post #AwZh0i2SKkbfFx0uEi by kybermace@poa.st
       2025-07-28T00:01:26.446344Z
       
       2 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @sickburnbro i normally don't bite on the eco stuff anymore, but having grown up being told that the damage to the ozone layer was "permanent", it surprised me to find out decades later that after CFCs were banned "the ozone layer healed itself". note how that entire talking point has evaporated.
       
 (DIR) Post #AwZhFFZETJBPIWHIum by sickburnbro@poa.st
       2025-07-28T00:04:06.078685Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @kybermace right, and there was never any evidence of how enough CFCs could get up there to eat the ozone given they are heavier than air.
       
 (DIR) Post #Awf0N4WoBjpswUTul6 by sandlotus@www.minds.com
       2025-07-30T13:31:01+00:00
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       OMG! THAT TRUMP STUPIDITY AGAIN! WE LIVED WITH TOO MCH CO2 IN THE 50's! WE DON'T WANT IT BACK! KNOW WHAT THE HELL SMOG IS?!  KNOW WHAT THE HELL THE OZONE LAYER IS?! GOD!....ROLLING IN STUPIDITY, ROLLING IN WILLFUL IGNORANCE! Like rolling in a pig sty.....and loving it! THAT is why YOU are called THE STUPID PARTY.
       
 (DIR) Post #Awf0N5cA9JiGJNzhk8 by sickburnbro@poa.st
       2025-07-30T13:31:54.773973Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @sandlotus sir, smog is not co2.
       
 (DIR) Post #Awf0mYTZyo3r417e5I by VikingWays@nicecrew.digital
       2025-07-30T13:34:13.581932Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       sandlotus has to be trolling and if not may a tsunami drag his corpse into the ocean
       
 (DIR) Post #Awf0mZXs0L5UNc8aPY by sickburnbro@poa.st
       2025-07-30T13:36:32.405232Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @VikingWays @sandlotus oh my no, I think they are serious. Whats interesting is that it is clear from the comment they have no idea what they are talking about, because it's good to not regulate something that isn't a pollutant as one, even if your intentions were good, because you weaken  how much people care about actual pollutants ( like PM2.5 - which causes smog )