Post Avan5mQKAddeKXEmJ6 by rjblaskiewicz@mstdn.social
(DIR) More posts by rjblaskiewicz@mstdn.social
(DIR) Post #AvalTudh4p9eqts1Ts by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T14:34:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Pssst…TAX THE RICH! NO EXCUSES, DO IT :pusheentired:
(DIR) Post #Avan2uHeUSw9q5oL4q by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T14:51:36Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Let's make the super rich one of us so they experience it themselves We only trying to help the billionaires, don't they see? We'll take them to normal levels again, no trouble
(DIR) Post #Avan5mQKAddeKXEmJ6 by rjblaskiewicz@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T14:52:08Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux Tax them humble.
(DIR) Post #AvanACvJaREZfzqOeW by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T14:52:56Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@rjblaskiewicz And beyonddd! tihibut yes
(DIR) Post #AvanPxNP9pcq5kUbwG by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T14:55:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
There is not a single reason in this universe where one person should own over a billion dollarsThere are however a billion reasons why people SHOULD NOT be able to own a billion dollarFunny how numbers work but also sad how we act upon them
(DIR) Post #AvanhlHYrWvdnKFX6W by mvrenselaar@mastodon.nl
2025-06-28T14:58:58Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux i have no problem with the rich as long as they pay their fsre share… which at minimum is what we pay %-wise
(DIR) Post #AvannSQds8wH3iDGlc by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T14:59:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mvrenselaar Same but i have a feeling that "rich" also works against that hole ideaSetting itself apart in wealth via X over Y let's sayIt's a crappy word
(DIR) Post #AvantIMaCymnZx68hM by mvrenselaar@mastodon.nl
2025-06-28T15:01:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux fair point… so its all just about fair share :)
(DIR) Post #AvanxEfprrAPIJyxaC by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T15:01:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mvrenselaar Ish, yes 😉 Totally fair it'll never be and that's okay I guess but the mega differences these days are simply not done anymore if you ask me
(DIR) Post #AvaoTWBEJaEqr93mpE by mvrenselaar@mastodon.nl
2025-06-28T15:07:37Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux true, one can argue the definition of fair…. But 1 person earning per minute what another earns in a year is never fair
(DIR) Post #AvauLR7TqSmMZNpt0i by fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.social
2025-06-28T16:13:19Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux If we don't tax them now, we will eat them sooner rather than later.
(DIR) Post #Avav8psUaDlrXtNfOq by Mattaob@mastodon.social
2025-06-28T16:22:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux pssssst:They follow the same tax-codes as everyone else.
(DIR) Post #AvavddlneNJ2yEwI8u by Mattaob@mastodon.social
2025-06-28T16:27:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux there is a BIG difference in owning a billion dollars, and owning stocks worth billion dollars. One is money in the bank, and the other is not.Should the billonaires be forced to sell?
(DIR) Post #AvawIh2oNg6mzzTJUe by plsik@mastodon.social
2025-06-28T16:35:17Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux It's not just about justice. It's about power. Once we have allowed some people to have enormous power over others, we have created our own social version of hell. And we live in it. Not to mention that that kind of power warps people, makes them psychopaths. Let's stop them from having power, save ourselves and help them.#tax #taxtherich
(DIR) Post #AvazRE4blOyrcE4YHQ by andrewbrenner@mastodon.social
2025-06-28T17:10:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux Tax, nails, staples, spikes will all do.
(DIR) Post #AvazXJI7HCnDXIIAAy by MasterMischief@mastodon.social
2025-06-28T17:11:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux I say we give them a choice, higher taxes or the guillotine.
(DIR) Post #AvbKjQFNL4cTcacuy8 by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T21:09:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Mattaob Yes. In theory it's the sameOne could always sell/trade stock for other forms of wealth that are more easy to convert to hard cashStocks are just another word for money in my eyes
(DIR) Post #AvbL9YYX4KWEv835k0 by stux@mstdn.social
2025-06-28T21:13:42Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@frenzybiscuit DONE! 😁 "billion dollars"there we go :blobcatgiggle:
(DIR) Post #AveKQXjjqp6Ip3hqsa by M8H@mastodon.social
2025-06-30T07:49:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux Dans mon pays, ils (le gouvernement) arrivent à calculer un "revenu minimum d'insertion" tout en prenant comme critère une certaine notion de la décence de façon pragmatique. À croire que la décence n'est qu'une considération pour parler uniquement des pauvres, puisque ils n'arrivent pas à calculer un revenu maximum dans un contexte où la décence serait aussi moralement valable et pragmatique! On est le pays qui taxe le plus, mais l'hyperclasse arrive à être celle qui l'est le moins.