Post AvTHtA7OJ2OFMrAJZw by poundquerydotinfo@forum.virctuary.com
 (DIR) More posts by poundquerydotinfo@forum.virctuary.com
 (DIR) Post #AvSlGkcPT4eskDJYQq by phoronix@masto.ai
       2025-06-24T17:54:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Fedora's FESCo To Decide Whether To Replace Upstream X.Org Server With XLibre ForkIn addition to the Fedora Engineering and Steering Committee (FESCo) having to decide on whether i686 support should end for Fedora Linux (including multilib), another contentious proposal is on replacing the X.Org X11 Server with the controversial XLibre fork...https://www.phoronix.com/news/Fedora-43-XLibre-Proposal
       
 (DIR) Post #AvSp2sfV8qHhTOOzZo by zombiewarrior@techhub.social
       2025-06-24T18:35:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @phoronix 1. xlibre project proudly anti-DEI, stated in README2. all of the authors original contributions to x11 had to be reverted because they broke everything3. he tried to change the licensing terms of x11 with 'sneaky' commits and edits4. nobody, anywhere on earth, needs a NEW fork of x11
       
 (DIR) Post #AvTHtA7OJ2OFMrAJZw by poundquerydotinfo@forum.virctuary.com
       2025-06-24T23:59:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @phoronix Leaving aside the legitimate concerns about the project's governance right now, and speaking as someone who'd dearly like Xorg to be forked by someone who cares about X11, XLibre doesn't sound as if it's a viable, compatible, replacement right now. Certainly it needs time to prove itself and for its developer base to prove their commitment to maintaining a stable, secure, and backward compatible X11 server.