Post Av8MfIlz749WEYNjfs by celeste_42bit@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) More posts by celeste_42bit@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) Post #Av8MfHRO4A5A6Njlvk by celeste_42bit@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-12T22:47:25Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Honestly... if Wikimedia pushes forward with the AI slop, I'll stop donating until they roll it back. I won't stand for more enshittification of open knowledge, and I sure as hell won't support it with my money.
       
 (DIR) Post #Av8MfIEf6xUuZCn7jc by hal8999@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-12T22:51:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @celeste_42bit  What AI slop?
       
 (DIR) Post #Av8MfIlz749WEYNjfs by celeste_42bit@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-12T23:03:17Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @hal8999 The disclaimer basically sais: "Yeah, it goes against our whole identity of being fact-checked and neutral. We implemented it anyways."
       
 (DIR) Post #Av8MfJWQKPIcYa6p3g by hal8999@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-12T23:14:24Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @celeste_42bit  It seems like an agenda issue for some WM staff, and not the consensus of editors.  I never saw a launch announcement, and I try to edit several times a week.This definitely goes against the published path for WM to adopt AI as a tool to support human editors, not generate content.https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Multigenerational/Artificial_intelligence_for_editors