Post AulousOxrVCLL71iwy by amuse@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) More posts by amuse@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) Post #Aulf34m8k1CoUW8cnA by amuse@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-03T21:11:21Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       I can't be the only one who thinks it's NUTS that cops are all routinely covering their faces now, right?Everyone talks about the split-second decisions police have to make, but what about citizens having a split second decide whether to struggle against a masked assailant?
       
 (DIR) Post #Aulf4OuTMqatE6fRAG by monarchist@na.social
       2025-06-03T22:52:03Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @amuse You have the right to film them, so they have the right to protect their identities.Action, reaction.
       
 (DIR) Post #AulousOxrVCLL71iwy by amuse@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-04T00:42:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @monarchist they're Taxpayer-Funded employees who are on the job with a Monopoly on the use of force. This isn't a "tit for tat" situation.As citizens, we have a right and responsibility to define how the police will behave, including whether or not there is a social expectation that police officers should be identifiable as such.
       
 (DIR) Post #AulvIjcMlrwIlv3TlI by monarchist@na.social
       2025-06-04T01:53:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @amuse If you want to know why they are doing this, now you do.
       
 (DIR) Post #Aulwd8OWSfXnMSs3zU by amuse@infosec.exchange
       2025-06-04T02:08:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @monarchist I know exactly why they're doing it and never indicated otherwise. What's unacceptable is that we are *allowing* them to do this.
       
 (DIR) Post #Aun4OJfrEez4nANtaa by monarchist@na.social
       2025-06-04T15:10:28Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @amuse If we have the right to film them, they have the right to protect themselves.Action, response.