Post AtsKddGMbfa8PYQERE by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
 (DIR) More posts by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
 (DIR) Post #AtsKddGMbfa8PYQERE by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
       2025-05-08T06:13:54Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Interesting (and very detailed, with performance analysis) analysis of the landscape of #TLS libraries, specially in the context of #QUIC adoption. Executive summary: no ideal library, but some are worse than others. The choice for developers is hard.Note: they do not mention licensing, I'm not sure that all the libraries mentioned are free software.https://www.haproxy.com/blog/state-of-ssl-stacks
       
 (DIR) Post #AtsOo3z0W5HhziX7R2 by Exagone313@share.elouworld.org
       2025-05-08T07:00:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer Yes they all are free software.And now I'm wondering how WolfSSL is able to sell commercial licenses for users not able to comply with the GPL, while accepting external contributions (there are no mentions of any CLA that contributors must sign).
       
 (DIR) Post #AtsPppB4dKjwbra4Ya by elecharny@framapiaf.org
       2025-05-08T07:12:06Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer The only sad thing is that they are doing their analysis on OpenSSL 3.0.14, when 3.5 is already out. Not sure it changes a thing but…