Post Atf6saRLdieBiAgKCu by me@social.jlamothe.net
 (DIR) More posts by me@social.jlamothe.net
 (DIR) Post #Atf6saRLdieBiAgKCu by me@social.jlamothe.net
       2025-04-30T13:04:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I wonder how difficult it would be to introduce rudimentary namespaces into #elisp.#emacs
       
 (DIR) Post #Atf6sbc1HWmHLYgMTo by galdor@fosstodon.org
       2025-04-30T20:35:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @me probably not that hard, but it’s a dead end because the powers that be hate the idea (and everything even remotely related to Common Lisp).
       
 (DIR) Post #Atf6scPIKKC1oNjiHg by screwtape@mastodon.sdf.org
       2025-04-30T21:36:33Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @me M-x list-packages M-x occur namespace yields names, namespaces and with-namespaces as current implementations of namespaces for elisp.@galdor
       
 (DIR) Post #Atf6sczS9t7HcWeae0 by galdor@fosstodon.org
       2025-04-30T22:17:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @screwtape @me Oh come on you understand the situation perfectly ;) You can write hacks to make it look like there are namespaces, but at the end of the day, they are just hacks.There has been multiple discussions about it on emacs-devel, and there is no way to get elisp out of the dark ages until the usual suspects are replaced. Which is not happening any time soon.
       
 (DIR) Post #Atf6sdXU7ML3K4Zlgm by akater@shitposter.world
       2025-05-01T21:08:28.416880Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @galdorElisp is in its light ages, I'd say.  It's more light than ever.@screwtape