Post Ata7ksRnvvOZPJz18a by kornel@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by kornel@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #AtZYVAnuQ51tJI6BX6 by Heidi@infosec.exchange
       2025-04-29T03:26:08Z
       
       10 likes, 3 repeats
       
       
       
 (DIR) Post #AtZYVBlopKx4J681ui by gentoobro@shitpost.cloud
       2025-04-29T04:49:48.658096Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       what a noob.Also, technically, if I recall, email addresses can have some strange form of comments inside them that makes it impossible to parse with regex. I've never seen one in the wild, and don't know if any software actually supports it.
       
 (DIR) Post #AtZwJbcdHZshuTqEFs by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
       2025-04-29T09:16:35Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Heidi It is Evil. It is not a proper regexp for email addresses, it is the work of the Dark Lord, pretending that TLD > 4 characters do not exist.#UniversalAcceptance
       
 (DIR) Post #Ata7ksRnvvOZPJz18a by kornel@mastodon.social
       2025-04-29T08:04:39Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @soviut only ~half of TLDs tho. It rejects 773 valid TLDs.As the owner of goof@img.horse, I'm outraged.
       
 (DIR) Post #AtaHk4hRtQZkewYaOG by tsadiq@masto.bike
       2025-04-29T13:16:37Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer if only it was just that one issue with this regexp 😬  @Heidi
       
 (DIR) Post #AtbfknkqyKGUS7zM0W by Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com
       2025-04-30T05:20:28.541007Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @gentoobro @Heidi Emails are in fact possible to parse with regex, the regex required is just so cursed that you're better off just doing something like; ^.*@*.\..*$
       
 (DIR) Post #AtdVqzW3XusDRSIesy by gentoobro@shitpost.cloud
       2025-05-01T02:38:59.128073Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I thought the (never used) comment specification was not a regular language, in that it needed to count, or something like that.