Post AtR0Th1Y0RF8bsMi7E by CatherineOrganic1@gigaohm.bio
(DIR) More posts by CatherineOrganic1@gigaohm.bio
(DIR) Post #AtMpUxtcsv7t6FDyro by jjcouey@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-22T13:11:45.817361Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Today's show might be the most important single show I have ever produced.1010EST. Taco Tuesday.
(DIR) Post #AtNp9cneJtZKkODGam by pmcdunnough@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T05:22:06.766126Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Definitely interesting. Am not a fan of randomization nor blinding for that matter, although blinding makes sense if knowing what one got affects behavior in a sequential design. Just take a large bunch and divide them into 2 comparable groups. Give group 1 the V, 2 saline. Then 4 weeks later 1 saline and 2 vaccine. Blind if you want of course which would please those who insist on it. The advantage of not blinding is you can follow along and see if something happens and save those who got the saline.Neat idea. Weird that something like that has never been done. Thanks for bringing it all up.
(DIR) Post #AtR0TbOivMDVA1A8PI by ontheway@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T13:28:41.960749Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
One important aspect of a scientific experiment would be to ensure that what is in the vials, claimed to be the vaccines, is what is on the labels, and not normal saline to confuse the safety signal. Jay alluded to this in his proposal yesterday.I was thinking of an extreme possibility over the weekend. If 1 in 31 children get "autism" in the USA, could it mean that only 1 in 31 shots they get contain what is on the label? Kennedy said with boys it's one 1 in 20, which complicates things.My point is, we could not trust that what is in the vials of an experiment is as claimed. It would need to be verified scientifically by trustworthy individuals and methods.
(DIR) Post #AtR0TckjszQBMaTEMS by PamelaDrew@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T13:56:33.163772Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Label fraud sabotage was my first thought and compounded by administration errors that could lead to kiddies getting a double dose of active substances.. seems like a high probability given the numbers of VAERS reports of shots that should have been diluted or adult doses mistakenly given to children.
(DIR) Post #AtR0TdYMuT7VqVgria by AlainPetit77@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T15:23:08.607687Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jjcouey I would map the USA for "autism" rates and in the high areas I would go to doctors and clinics and swap out their MMR vaxes with what was delivered for the Short Term Study…Circumventing any evil doings if I was RFK…Make it impossible for them to cheat…
(DIR) Post #AtR0TeFyILzy1k5ggK by PamelaDrew@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T15:30:10.201689Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Impossible without full control of chain of custody from lab to jab.
(DIR) Post #AtR0Tf03X0rUKfeUVs by CatherineOrganic1@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T18:21:26.659968Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
storage of vials last dose, for later verification? Means storage, collection and delivery to testing centre though.
(DIR) Post #AtR0Tfo2XAqOph2PQG by AlainPetit77@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T19:03:54.746239Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
who works and owns the testing centers.
(DIR) Post #AtR0TgTA4HjmtEHFWC by PamelaDrew@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-23T21:56:51.293082Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Big pharma.. search 'Brooke Jackson' for testing site details.
(DIR) Post #AtR0Th1Y0RF8bsMi7E by CatherineOrganic1@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-24T07:57:59.282686Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
so independent govt laboratories, forensics, with microbiology and basic urine biochem dont exist? They are needed... this handover of investigative power to pharma is part of the problem. Sold to the people as efficiency and moneysaving.
(DIR) Post #AtR0ThnP8VWZ0Ikvi4 by sam_harris@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-24T09:04:36.495406Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Why not just strictly limit all initial testing to the entire extended family of Paul Offit, Peter Hotez and Vinnie Rancid. They seem very keen to help so let them have at it. Do the intensive short term tests on them and their grand kids and then make it a decades long effort to validate all the initial results.Surprised none of them have already volunteered themselves. We can even validate the theoretical 10,000 injections per kid claim at the same time. This seems like a perfect opportunity to settle the matter once and for all.
(DIR) Post #AtR0TiGTOQmCSSM91E by CatherineOrganic1@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-24T14:18:27.904473Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
10,000/kid claim?? what?
(DIR) Post #AtR0Tj2gVBLCryueAK by sam_harris@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-24T15:27:55.165644Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Quoting Offit "Current research shows that young infants are fully capable of generating protective immune responses to multiple vaccines given simultaneously. “Our analysis shows that infants have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at once. "https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020109073542.htm
(DIR) Post #AtR0TjzAzi83nOHMKu by OisinPage@gigaohm.bio
2025-04-24T19:03:34.390047Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
So Offit believes kids are robust enough to handle 10,000 vaccines at once ... BUT... the same kids can't handle natural exposure to even one virus at any one time?! 🤪