Post As1utU6Pg10ZPUBAqO by 0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd@mostr.pub
 (DIR) More posts by 0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd@mostr.pub
 (DIR) Post #As1utQtBcje5Ray4JM by ee11a5dff40c19a555f41fe42b48f00e618c91225622ae37b6c2bb67b76c4e49@mostr.pub
       2025-03-14T00:26:01.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Nostr could do some of the things Alex says Bluesky does better:1) We can create a new kind that replaces kind 1 which has spans (or facets) indicating bold, or url, or anything else.  I wanted to do it that way since years ago when we had the '[0]' replacements (I thought it should just be a span in a tag with no placeholder in the content)2) If we think a chain of events is needed to prove that none of your events were censored (so we can properly claim censorship resistance), we could add another kind where authors publish their chain of events as a list of IDs.  If it needs some kind of mergeability to fix race conditions, I've talked about how to do that with a last-write-wins (LWW) conflict free replicated data type (CRDT) in https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1630.
       
 (DIR) Post #As1utS5HBGuV9NdEnI by 930ccef12372dd2f16057cfc54f0dbd94335d8b51b4e2737236b00cab718fcd9@mostr.pub
       2025-03-14T00:46:07.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       You are effectively saying that Nostr can be anything, but it can't, not unless the clients with most market share options in, but if that is to be taken for granted, then Nostr can have Pkarr IDs and Peergos data model etc. I wish that was true, but you can't have both decentralised development and agility at the same time, the more independent clients the more ossified the development becomes, this is an old story since Email failing to get any end to end encryption, while Signal doing it in few years.
       
 (DIR) Post #As1utSzzmOHRzIAXCa by 0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd@mostr.pub
       2025-03-14T01:25:17.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       This Signal/email thing is a meme I never understood. As a client developer you can just implement stuff. Does that make it no longer decentralized? Not sure if it's a definitions problem or people just get a mental block. But you can do it.
       
 (DIR) Post #As1utU6Pg10ZPUBAqO by 0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd@mostr.pub
       2025-03-14T01:26:59.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Basically I think the Signal guy said that just as a justification to not be decentralized.
       
 (DIR) Post #As1utV2uAXnQKtXt0y by sun@shitposter.world
       2025-03-14T01:28:21.213975Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd @930ccef12372dd2f16057cfc54f0dbd94335d8b51b4e2737236b00cab718fcd9 @ee11a5dff40c19a555f41fe42b48f00e618c91225622ae37b6c2bb67b76c4e49 his argument was that like email or xmpp, you get paralyzed by having to support lowest common denominator implementations. he chose to rip out federation from signal because it affected his ability to iterate quickly. that was his claim anyway
       
 (DIR) Post #As1v0l4D0ADm3FcHWS by Hoss@shitpost.cloud
       2025-03-14T01:29:43.915564Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Signal was federated?
       
 (DIR) Post #As1vIKD3axMby38E0O by sun@shitposter.world
       2025-03-14T01:32:55.484583Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @Hoss @0461fcbecc4c3374439932d6b8f11269ccdb7cc973ad7a50ae362db135a474dd @930ccef12372dd2f16057cfc54f0dbd94335d8b51b4e2737236b00cab718fcd9 @ee11a5dff40c19a555f41fe42b48f00e618c91225622ae37b6c2bb67b76c4e49 I don't know a lot of detail about this but I think they ripped out out really early on. they never open sourced their server.