Post Arry9oCF5lpGe5mYHA by gabi@freesoftwareextremist.com
 (DIR) More posts by gabi@freesoftwareextremist.com
 (DIR) Post #ArqSn1LwidW93J0zOi by Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com
       2025-03-08T12:51:40.797734Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!But only GNU ed.
       
 (DIR) Post #ArqUxLkLwzOP6eU4em by anthk@paquita.masto.host
       2025-03-08T12:52:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Suiseiseki na, openbsd ed from ibara at gh.Altough I prefer Sam.
       
 (DIR) Post #ArqUxMwnUCwOpXJWgy by Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com
       2025-03-08T13:15:55.390839Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @anthk Of course you would use a version of ed that's proprietary actually proprietary.
       
 (DIR) Post #ArqXoACNodF6XzuFFo by anthk@paquita.masto.host
       2025-03-08T13:18:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Suiseiseki not propietary, isc.
       
 (DIR) Post #ArqXoB14m9nB5DcjGi by Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com
       2025-03-08T13:47:53.884356Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @anthk BSD developers don't actually bother to ensure that the software is free. Often it's the case that they're able to license some files under ISC and other under 3-clause BSD, but they have no permission to license some other files and they leave those files unlicensed, rather than replace them.
       
 (DIR) Post #Arry9oCF5lpGe5mYHA by gabi@freesoftwareextremist.com
       2025-03-08T17:08:24.997383Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Suiseiseki The Church of ED is fine as long as they glorify a free ED and impose penance on the use of a proprietary ED.