Post ArpG710EEo7JCB6Id6 by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
(DIR) More posts by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
(DIR) Post #ArpG6rA8p66Wg1f4gy by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T10:35:23.120549Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Just a peak at what they talk about these days...Lab leak vs zoonotic, not quite RNA cannot pandemic. Just it's not a lab leak.Some talk about hospital murders but not precisely.Enter the no-virus ...https://fxtwitter.com/SeanBFlanagan/status/1895842861301854280Article(s): https://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2023/06/15/covid-origin-wcw-investigation-proves-u-s-govt-funded-patient-zero/https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/yes-we-believe-the-bergamo-italyNitter: https://nitter.space/SeanBFlanagan/status/1895842861301854280
(DIR) Post #ArpG6s5DOtl3X2MeeW by sam_harris@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T13:49:37.409086Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The no-virus thing seems to be a purposefully contrived thought terminator. It gets injected into a conversation and everyone immediately starts swirling around it. Then everyone forgets what they were originally talking about. Eventually conversation might start to get back on track again at which point someone throws in another no virus hand grenade.
(DIR) Post #ArpG6snAlSv5jMvlAW by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T14:06:21.618965Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Pick any virus and show me that it exists. I can wait. We can start with measles if you like...That's a CFR of 1 in 10,000 if you believe the bullshit the CDC puts on its website. They claim in 1912-ish decade claimed 60,000 people in ten years, still nearly a decade before penicillin was discovered.Most places didn't have indoor toilets until the 50s, no electricity until the 30s. The Interstate didn't exist until 1956. These are just facts that most people who are alive have no living memory of, just a fresh memory of terror molecules and no connection to nature.
(DIR) Post #ArpG6tehYRjoPNyVbU by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T15:13:06.790193Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I do understand their point as well. I often encounter the NO virus argument on X, and it pretty much always winds up looking like this. If a person is convinced by the no virus position, this is the logical conclusion; If you are a believer in the no virus side of things, then anyone talking about viruses is empowering a false narrative as witting or unwitting false opposition.Has anyone looked closely at the experiments done by that Jamie dude? I haven’t. On the surface, though, they look pretty damning. Has virology just been mistaking cellular debris for viruses?For myself, I have an agnostic view, though it seems pretty clear that RNA is not a “virus”. I am still not sure about poxes or warts and other DNA viruses which kind of seem to have some level of contagiousness….The most valuable contribution of the NO virus position is showing the intellectual mess in the history of the science behind the common diseases—the weak science, the failed contagion studies, the reclassifications and definition changes, etc.
(DIR) Post #ArpG6ubu0L5pMzfmsa by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T15:18:04.107330Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
"If you are a believer in the no virus side of things, then anyone talking about viruses is empowering a false narrative as witting or unwitting false opposition."Yes, and? Isn't that the same line of reasoning about believing in the WuFlu and the plandemic at this point?
(DIR) Post #ArpG6vC3pu15B8afEu by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T15:23:37.002910Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Yes. So I understand their logic. I also find myself asking this: even if they are not exactly correct, wouldn’t it be better world if normies took the no virus position?
(DIR) Post #ArpG6vuNB9ShOZK3JA by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T15:29:22.921325Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Exactly. Might as well act like no viruses exist because even if it's not entirely correct, it deflates their reasoning.The flip side is the card they play, which is that viruses exist and cause disease and harm and require jabs. The more you look into jabs and viruses you realize the ponzi scheme and the harm...so in terms of "harm reduction" is it better to believe the lies and take poison and poison neonates and children, or be skeptical and reject whatever salvageable theory and prophylaxis of these clearly political genda driven and profit motive and harm causing regimens?
(DIR) Post #ArpG6wZUiGM5S6YtP6 by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T15:43:18.706814Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Yup. That’s the current choice. It has a clear answer IMHO.Is the alternative a corruption based argument? I recently called no virus “mischaracterized phenomena” . If no virus denotes that nothing is there, and that is too far outside the Overton window, is a acknowledgment that the polluted science requires a pause in injections for the purpose of re-examination of all the underlying science?Or is a better tact to take that even if viruses exist, IM injections are biologically dumb because bypassing the barriers and poisoning people does not lead to immunity?
(DIR) Post #ArpG6xJvvbVBm8Hymu by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T15:59:29.643249Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Okay.So almost all of Jay's current slide decks are off topic. 1. We need to start the focus on how stupid the IM argument is... it can't possibly work. 2. Followed up by how antibodies don't confer immunity even if that bullshit conjecture worked.3. Followed up by all the harmful contents in the jabs as adjuvants and proprietary ingredients. 4. Followed up by the lack of reliable side-effects testing and monitoring, 5. leading into the problem with the tuffle hound factories and all the bad science, not enough emphasis on bad science6. leading into the corruption, grift grant chasing which leads into the funding of the grants and the policy setting by politically motivated/ideologues by the govt[ 6.1 maybe viruses don't exist at all6.2 failed virology theory and practisemaybe none of this because it's in the weeds, which hudson isn't entirely wrong about ]7. and the amount of taxpayer money wasted on this "research" and the profit-motive corruption contracts for jab juice and masks and testing 8. and then finally how all the slices of the harm cake is beneficial to the oligarch overclass, from the divide and conquer virus-no-virus to the maiming of babies to the heart tissue death in young boys.9. the overall conversion of the planet to oligarch granted permissions is a tyrannical prison planet surveillance state teetering on the verge of its own collapse because of all the corruption, bad science and "all that matters is what people think is true."Summary: What we've got right now are a couple of salient points and a lot of "who was right first" and "which bugaboo is the biggest buggaboo in the closet".TL;DR what we're at right now is a deep rabbit hole of chasing glownigger rabbits instead of creating the smoothest most digestible messaging for the widest possible target audience devoid of personal ax grinding and emotion
(DIR) Post #ArpG6y4j7cvs7GBLiy by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T16:07:55.216349Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
These 9 points could probably be summed up in 9 meme images and move the needle farther than anything so far.
(DIR) Post #ArpG6z9N7qF5RxMZbU by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T22:52:28.749792Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
i could really use these meme images... um... today. lol.
(DIR) Post #ArpG703jkHKSGljaSW by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T23:06:03.259944Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
taking those 9 points and cleaning them up:1. The IM Argument is Nonsense – The entire immune memory (IM) argument is fundamentally flawed. It doesn’t work the way they claim, and it never could.2. Antibodies ≠ Immunity – Even if the IM theory were valid, antibodies alone don’t confer immunity. This is a baseless assumption, not a scientific fact.3. Toxic Ingredients – The shots contain harmful known ingredients and -- worse -- undisclosed proprietary ingredients, with zero transparency on long-term effects.4. No Reliable Safety Testing – Side effects aren’t properly tracked, and monitoring systems are intentionally weak, making it impossible to assess true risk.5. Bad Science Everywhere – The entire system relies on flawed research, rubber-stamped conclusions, and an industry built on protecting its own bad science.6. The Corrupt Money Pipeline – Research funding is dictated by government-backed ideologues chasing grant money, not truth or real scientific inquiry. [actually, i would argue that it is dictated by ideologues at funding agencies, government and NGO like Gates etc] (Optional: Are viruses even real? The foundations of virology are built on shaky, outdated theories that fail under scrutiny.)7. Taxpayer-Funded Corruption – Public money is funneled into useless “research,” rigged contracts, and a never-ending cash flow for vaccines, masks, and tests.8. The Harm is Intentional – Every piece of the puzzle—fear, division, injuries, and deaths—ultimately benefits the ruling class, not public health.9. The Endgame: Control – The entire system is pushing toward a technocratic surveillance state, where freedom is reduced to whatever the oligarchs allow—until the whole corrupt structure collapses under its own weight.
(DIR) Post #ArpG710EEo7JCB6Id6 by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-06T02:03:52.572024Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Nice rewrite!
(DIR) Post #ArpG71zCa6tEFHczfU by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-06T21:16:23.382461Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
it still needs a bit of simplification, i think. but i admit that i bashed chatgpt to help. "assume the persona of a skeptic of all conventional stories and dogma... take these points and clean them up so that they are concise." or something like that.
(DIR) Post #ArpG72wP20FFCtKGwa by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-06T23:01:15.219236Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Agree. Today during the stream I was really remarking to myself about all the video clutter, distraction, massive amounts of text on each slide, the opposite of "low noise".I agree with you about commitment to 2hrs.I'd personally stream more but for shorter, and by more I mean...1. General Welcome Stream (the 9 points we've been talking about)2. Playing Field (Recap) where all the usual suspects get outlined, basically "what we know"3. Mechanisms of Meddling stream that outlines all the techniques we've come to observe4. Meddler Decimation timeline5. Free form discussion and goals, audience feedback6. VOD of the academic credentials, Jay's background, it's really a distraction for anybody who's seen it more than twice and mostly irrelevant in the current social media world, it should be there but only at a point when somebody has become interested in what backs up all the meat slides, otherwise it's blocking new people with a small amount of time tuning into each stream, they aren't electing to attention a lecture and want to hear the creds at the start
(DIR) Post #ArpG73Tj26tqsEussq by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T16:39:18.067993Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
there also needs to be a super short e-book. the kind that are free to download, with huge font sizes so that there are 5 sentences per page (i exaggerate but not too much). Canva has templates for this sort of thing.
(DIR) Post #ArpG74Lbnm09ZM7us4 by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T16:47:15.357511Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
How about the substack?https://gigaohm.bio/objects/7ab31bb6-6bd0-4f5e-8811-7940051f9635
(DIR) Post #ArpG75DqY7O2HZVEPY by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T18:17:33.389701Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
both. you can drop a link to a pdf in a DM or in a tweet or wherever. low barrier, no email harvesting. substack almost always requires that you give over an email.remove as many barriers and as much friction for the first encounter.
(DIR) Post #ArpG75N3zql8k9oamG by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-05T23:07:28.860079Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
one could create an instagram account and have just those 9 images as a 3x3 grid. if Meta would let you keep it there.
(DIR) Post #ArpG762tUKDgptNzyi by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T21:05:24.442897Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
You can also just publish pages to GitHub and other Git repos online. Almost all of them supports something called GitHub Pages.Naturally on GitHub itself you can write in Markdown, but there's a trick for converting that automatically to HTML for the GitHub pages site. So you just do the changes in the easier Markdown format and it'll take care of generating the equivalent look in HTML.The risk is that this gets taken down, but our redundancies are:Everyone who clones the repo has a copy of it including the historical changesWe can upload the repo again anywhere (e.g. BitBucket, GitLab).@tedb can create a forwarding DNS (CNAME) entry to point (i.e.) https://vaccines.gigaohm.bio to the correct site so we can have a permanent link no matter where it moves.optionally if we can't publish it anywhere, we can fund a self-hosted Gitea/GitLab version and basically be up and going again without losing any of the work.
(DIR) Post #ArpG7AoXl6iBcpi6nw by Jen@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T18:18:54.546188Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
this obviously goes in the category of "do as i say, not as i do" lol.
(DIR) Post #ArpGKwQI3sk92uvnZA by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T21:12:07.335471Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
so what you're saying is there's not an ap for that?I'm down! I think it would be an incredible tool, especially the link repository.
(DIR) Post #ArpGKxBREaSPP8zS3U by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T22:53:31.053913Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Kinda. There's an entire subsystem basically. It's popular enough concept it's reproduced across different Git sites.https://pages.github.com/https://docs.gitlab.com/user/project/pages/https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/publishing-a-website-on-bitbucket-cloud/(If we had to selfhost Gitea) https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-serverThere are 2 "layers" to this.GitGit hostingGit itself is a stand-alone tool for developers to deal with source control (changes in code that may need to be reverted). It was invented by a certain Linus Torvalds (who also invented something else that people use every day). It solved the problem of distributed/sometimes-offline code (e.g. text file) repositories. So it has built in mechanisms for synching up with other repos & dealing w/ conflicts. All of this is done on the command line.There are git gui "clients" which made the most common operations much easier to understand for regular people.When web repositories were popularized, it opened up a lot of other tooling (like searching).So the way to think about it that makes sense is that every git repo is a "clone" of another one. They have some "relationship" to make the grammar/language around it easier (e.g. origin, push, pull, fork), but essentially they are all copies which can be advanced on their own & also have changes "contributed" back to any of them.How it figures out what the changes are is through diffs (specifically through hashes, but we don't have to get that technical). So it knows which changes are different in one repo to another. You can "pick" which changes. Mainly its strength will always be TEXT-based changes (not binaries like PDFs, Word Documents or images).This is where the Markdown comes in. It's just a text-based easy formatting standard. This makes the medium well suited for a git-like experience.Thanks to the advance of GitHub (and the like), you can even do most of the editing on the site in a web browser! So the barrier to entry is even lower. (So your clone will exist on the web.)e.g. Here @Cathie_Leavitt makes her contributions using the web, then submits changes using a Pull Request: https://github.com/gigaohm/Stream.Transcripts/pull/4Here's an ex of changes to an MD file:https://github.com/gigaohm/Stream.Transcripts/commits/main/twitch/2324055656%20(2024-12-11)%20-%20Waaay%20Back%20Wednesdays%20--%20(11%20DEC%202024)/README.md(the other view) https://github.com/gigaohm/Stream.Transcripts/blame/main/twitch/2324055656%20(2024-12-11)%20-%20Waaay%20Back%20Wednesdays%20--%20(11%20DEC%202024)/README.mdHere's an ex of a pretty fancy site using this technique (probably waaaaay more than we'd ever do).Site Page: https://matteobaccan.github.io/owner/docs/building/Source (in MD): https://github.com/matteobaccan/owner/blob/master/owner-site/site/docs/building.mdIf interested, then I would suggest trying the following (Level 1: Make changes to text files and push them to the main repo):Create a GitHub account.Clone a repo (e.g. the Stream.Transcripts) (YourClone)Using a git gui client (e.g. SourceTree, GitHub Desktop), make a clone of your repo (YourClone).You need this because then your local edits can be pushed to the web (YourClone) repo w/o additional permissions because it is your repo.Create a branch for your (local or web) edits.Create a Pull Request back to the main branch of the originating repo (where you cloned from).(The reason a branch: your changes go into the "main branch" of the originating repo. This branch is mirrored in your clone repo. Due to the way Git works (to be fast), it will see your branch & the main branch as different & create a conflict which will show up as no differences. To keep things simple, working this way, you can just delete your branch later after the changes are merged & you "resync" your clone w/ the main one.)TerminologyClone: A copy of a repo (as another repo). Usually the clone is only a clone of a specific branch in the originating repo.Fork: A "linked" copy of a repo on the same platform ecosystem (e.g. on another GitHub account or organization)Branch: A snapshot of your existing repo, so you can isolate changes before merging back into the originating branch. (The changes in this branch are isolated from every other branch. You can make a branch of a branch. One branch is considered the "main" branch (aka "source of truth").)The other way to collaborate is to have direct write access to the main repo, but in that case, everyone who's contributing needs to up their git skills so that mistakes don't happen. (+ policies around how to create commits, how to use branches, etc need to be setup... this all goes away if you work on your own repo & just do a PR later.)
(DIR) Post #ArpGKxjTC3gB6gud6G by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T22:57:26.480534Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I do markdown and static sites for all my content now. Instead of the GitHub pages my markdown is in the git repository and runs through a program called Hugo in my pipeline that then publishes to a static site either an AWS S3 bucket or a website that’s running on Nginx or anything I wanthttps://gohugo.io/
(DIR) Post #ArpGTFYao2O8hnmCVU by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T22:15:01.156037Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I second the idea of a common repo, that way I can do what I want and push updates into a branch to share and also build things like PDFs, slide decks or mini-clips with tools even
(DIR) Post #ArpGTGW9Ec1jgVdlKq by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T22:57:50.948275Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
If there's enough interest in this, @tedb can create a repo and give people access. (e.g. people who know how to use git).Everyone else can contribute by cloning the repo and then submitting changes back. Not everyone has to have the tooling working (e.g. generate a PDF).There are also people in the community that are well versed in GitHub actions (e.g. @jazzilla). If tooling happens at that level, then basically things will "auto build" (e.g. a new PDF will be generated) when we make changes to the text files.But all that comes later.
(DIR) Post #ArpGTHDOdocbqdsIkK by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T22:58:56.556718Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I would probably use self host to get repo centrally (despite Get repositories being fully decentralised) And not put it on GitHub as I don’t want to draw the attention of any censors.
(DIR) Post #ArpKvjvJtg2ooKFOq0 by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T23:03:08.470017Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
What's the pricing going to look like for that? Are you willing to setup it up for everyone? Will people pitch in to cover the cost of the project?There's also another "non-cloud" self host option. Tailscale + funnel (+ VM/docker), but that will also take someone with technical abilities to setup.Optionally to get started, we can just start another org... then even if it draws attention, it's isolated. Or even put it on another host like GitLab.
(DIR) Post #ArpKvkfl71Bv8LyUDo by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T23:08:02.834921Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I am willing to put in some $, depending on the cost.
(DIR) Post #ArpKvlMIYrDdGHsSWm by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T23:48:54.694652Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
No extra cost. The server we currently run stuff on is mostly idle except when transcoding streams and video uploads. Would just add another vhost on there if it’s something @jjcouey is ok with. Serving static content is cheap and easy and also hosting a lightweight GitHub alternate. Options could be any of these:Gitea – Lightweight, self-hosted GitHub alternative, low resource use.Forgejo – Gitea fork with federation & stronger FOSS focus.GitLab CE – Full GitHub alternative, CI/CD, but heavy.SourceHut – Minimal, email-based, no JavaScript, privacy-focused.Kallithea – Git & Mercurial support, LDAP, repo management.Radicle – Decentralized, P2P, Tor support, no central servers.
(DIR) Post #ArpL4jFnkwO5L977aq by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-07T23:50:34.314877Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
No extra cost. The server we currently run stuff on is mostly idle except when transcoding streams and video uploads. Would just add another vhost on there if it’s something @jjcouey is ok with. Serving static content is cheap and easy and also hosting a lightweight GitHub alternate. Options could be any of these:Gitea – Lightweight, self-hosted GitHub alternative, low resource use.Forgejo – Gitea fork with federation & stronger FOSS focus.GitLab CE – Full GitHub alternative, CI/CD, but heavy.SourceHut – Minimal, email-based, no JavaScript, privacy-focused.Kallithea – Git & Mercurial support, LDAP, repo management.Radicle – Decentralized, P2P, Tor support, no central servers.
(DIR) Post #ArpPgWirCAwtINz1Oa by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T00:35:22.887815Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Whoever's gonna head the project (e.g. @freemayonnaise ?) should pitch in on their preferences.So, I think the path we're targeting right now is a content "git" server self hosted on a VM (e.g. web vhost), which has background jobs to generate the static site which is also hosted by gigaohm?Where will the background job scripts live? On the main github org?So just the content goes into self-hosted Git?I've only run Gitea self-hosted, so I can't say much about the other ones. (Of course Gitea itself doesn't run it's own "pages" w/o a "plugin", but if we're just pushing content somewhere else, that's not a problem.)With static content pushed elsewhere, is there a search solution? Or we expect search engines to pick up the content? (e.g. local js-based search index).
(DIR) Post #ArpPgXgPckaUH5qaDw by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T00:42:12.018350Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
This is where GitHub + actions is good. We could leverage that but I would advocate for the git repo being private so as to not draw attention. Otherwise we just use an Open Source actions equivalent:Gitea / Forgejo → No built-in CI/CD ✅ Use Woodpecker CI 🔧 Define .woodpecker.yml for pipelines GitLab CE → ✅ Built-in CI/CD (GitLab Runner) 🔧 Define .gitlab-ci.yml SourceHut → ✅ Native CI/CD (build.sr.ht) 🔧 Define .build.yml Kallithea → ❌ No built-in CI/CD ✅ Use Woodpecker CI, Jenkins, or Drone CI Radicle → ❌ No built-in CI/CD ✅ Use Woodpecker CI, Jenkins, or custom runners Best CI/CD choices:🔹 Lightweight (Gitea/Forgejo) → Woodpecker CI🔹 Full GitHub Actions alternative → GitLab CI/CD🔹 Minimalist CI/CD → SourceHut build.sr.ht🔹 Self-hosted enterprise CI/CD → Jenkins, Drone CI
(DIR) Post #ArpTyspw76wQuWIr9E by AlainPetit77@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T01:29:45.296138Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
I can chip in…
(DIR) Post #ArpaMsT9jN5WRiTLJQ by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T00:48:05.502249Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The downside of a private GH repo is that everyone who wants to contribute needs access to it (which isn't terrible). It still means people have local clones if they want.Is the "Best choices" stack ranked to your preference? What's your experience with Woodpecker CI?(Side thought about vhosts, gitea also needs an SSH port open, so if it's just a web vhost, then there's still additional work to do for the SSH port side of things. I think it can run on a non-standard port though...).
(DIR) Post #ArpaMtCX0fNsiRha2S by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T02:41:54.107841Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
They were the choices listed by an LLM as alternates.I do CI/CD on a daily basis for part of my day job so any of them are OK for me.I think the easiest then is a public self hosted gitlab style with some local runners and publishing docs to a static site maybe even just an S3 bucket behind a CDN will be the fastest. I already wrote terraform to spin an S3/SSL/CDN stack that’s super cheap like 50c per month.Let me POC something. If anyone wants to chip in, it’s to @jjcouey as he pays the hosting bill. I just give my time as value for value on what I get from his work. Plus I enjoy it.
(DIR) Post #ArpaU8idiGr6s3B3vE by tedb@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T02:43:13.919967Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Naming is hard. Someone throw me some names for the address for:git hoststatic site for content
(DIR) Post #ArpcwIKjlBFmhqYBQu by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T03:10:18.621701Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
git.gigaohm.bio, obviously!
(DIR) Post #ArpdBZ2juqY2sGPgMC by freemayonnaise@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T03:12:38.744933Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
and maybe files.gigaohm.bio if we actually get some content into the git repo and do some automated content creation... I dunno.I don't personally need a "github" style interface, I think everyone should be able to run git locally in whatever form and just clone/pull from a normal git repo, saves having to have all that extra stuff running too
(DIR) Post #ArpxXmoPP0cR21aFxA by AlainPetit77@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T03:34:59.718486Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
git.urassoverhereatgigaohm.bioToo long….
(DIR) Post #ArpxXnVIpWvjB3eVoO by Zardoz@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T06:59:39.183710Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
VaxScamVaxttruthVaxFactsFactsNotVaxScamologyNojabs Jabfreefuture
(DIR) Post #Arq3tguAe2Lwo66hYe by soothspider@gigaohm.bio
2025-03-08T08:08:21.766838Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
There are 2 hard problems in computer science:Naming thingsRecursionOff-by-one errors😉