Post ArJvaAT0YuacVyHRa4 by ondrase@mastodon.social
(DIR) More posts by ondrase@mastodon.social
(DIR) Post #ArG1chPAtMj8LIEo6q by BrodieOnLinux@mstdn.social
2025-02-18T22:57:39Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Fedora Project Leader On OBS & Fedora Flatpak Drama #Linux #YouTube https://youtu.be/oKP1hgdFJKo
(DIR) Post #ArG3ZDye30pc74Idlo by aks@scalie.zone
2025-02-18T23:19:23Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux good video, now i know why fedora flatpaks exist.
(DIR) Post #ArGxGXfoBjnp8A9om0 by dieTasse@floss.social
2025-02-19T09:43:32Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux Very nice explanation, they should've communicated this more. Now I like the idea of Fedora flatpaks 😀
(DIR) Post #ArI4hvQ4tyjPQzlPyy by rdbende@mastodon.social
2025-02-19T22:41:34Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux pls do basic fact checking next time. Nothing said about Flathub/Flatpak is actually true.
(DIR) Post #ArI4kGUhWBaNNK2eoq by BrodieOnLinux@mstdn.social
2025-02-19T22:42:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@rdbende Do you want to give an example?
(DIR) Post #ArI57tiVr46xgOlsEy by rdbende@mastodon.social
2025-02-19T22:46:05Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux Sure! Here are some: "the rules are fairly lax what goes into Flathub", "the thing that says verified just says that it’s verified from the developer themselves", "maybe it was built in a coffee shop on some laptop or whatever"
(DIR) Post #ArI7iFjJgk7IHvbtmy by rdbende@mastodon.social
2025-02-19T22:55:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux The reality is, that Flathub is famous for its fairly strict requerements about permissions and thorough reviews. You can only publish apps built on Flathub's public build servers, that give flatpak-builder no internet access. The build manifests are also public, you can inspect them, verify the checksums and actually the manifest an app was built with gets included in the final package.This is all there on Flathub's docs.
(DIR) Post #ArI7iGgs7JktGdTScK by rdbende@mastodon.social
2025-02-19T22:59:39Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux Actually, here's a blog post, that sums it up well: https://blogs.gnome.org/alatiera/2025/02/19/the-fedora-project-leader-is-willfully-ignorant-about-flathub/Obviously it was not you, who said all this, but it's also not great to let other people spread misinformation on your channel.
(DIR) Post #ArI7iHT5E4JtgA1xlQ by BrodieOnLinux@mstdn.social
2025-02-19T23:15:19Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@rdbende No one tagged me in this, I had no idea this was going on
(DIR) Post #ArI8ffdh0AaPjJJQUS by rdbende@mastodon.social
2025-02-19T23:25:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux so far you seemed to understand well how Flathub/Flatpak works though. I don't understand how Matt could go through all this nonsense, and you just posted it on the main channel.
(DIR) Post #ArJvaAT0YuacVyHRa4 by ondrase@mastodon.social
2025-02-20T20:08:36Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@BrodieOnLinux I still think that the existence of the fedora flatpak repo and the priorities and all that are fine.Even if the package is almost broken maybe there is that 1 person with strange config and for him it just works.But if users cannot tell which package they have installed maybe your are doing something wrong.