Post AmTLevGfKRV0AYukRU by lutris@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) More posts by lutris@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) Post #AmTLHU06Xbu8wQzVOy by lutris@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T19:45:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       If packaging Lutris as a Snap was actually possible, it would have been done by now... 🙄
       
 (DIR) Post #AmTLHUfw25Mh2AYubQ by 10leej@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T19:48:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lutris I'm curious what the blockers are
       
 (DIR) Post #AmTLevGfKRV0AYukRU by lutris@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T19:52:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @10leej one major blocker is the inability for a Snap to talk to / control other Snaps. So it's impossible for the Lutris Snap to launch the Retroarch Snap, for example.
       
 (DIR) Post #AmTLi1MJ8g5xvf1xtQ by 10leej@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T19:53:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lutris Wait they dont have a protocol you could use for that? interesting.
       
 (DIR) Post #AmTLjGaU0MBbRvFsB6 by lutris@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T19:53:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @10leej Flatpak does
       
 (DIR) Post #AmTMskUiHSzIlSdqV6 by 10leej@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T20:06:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lutris @ubuntu could take a look at this.
       
 (DIR) Post #AmTOGd13puI4TWir4q by lutris@fosstodon.org
       2024-09-28T20:22:09Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @10leej Snap is working as intended around its own security model. This has been discussed with Snap developers and isn't something that will be changed any time soon.