Post AmKX6CPv1i8IFToPeC by jraedisch@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by jraedisch@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #AmKTEUFmCBHO4ElSTY by wjmaggos@liberal.city
       2024-09-24T13:05:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The web is full of shit but we mostly don't see it cause nobody we know links to it. Obscurity protects us. Anybody can post anything but there's no algo making sure that we see something that upsets us when we open a browser. There's no economic incentive for engagement. We don't need mods scouring the web making sure it won't upset anyone.Similarly, the fedi can do free speech better than corporate platforms because there's no pressure to chase profit here. That's the trade-off. #SocialWeb
       
 (DIR) Post #AmKVJeZVSZH7QPaI1A by jraedisch@mastodon.social
       2024-09-24T13:28:16Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wjmaggos so you are arguing, that moderation isn’t that important on e.g. Mastodon? I tend to agree, but then I have never been attacked on any platform. Lots of people here seem to have different experiences (even on here) and thus different opinions on moderation.
       
 (DIR) Post #AmKWBpFRys5iAv2CbQ by wjmaggos@liberal.city
       2024-09-24T13:38:12Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jraedisch I am arguing that on fedi, moderation only focus on tagging and spamming hashtags. where one user pushes content on others. outside of that, we should let people post anything that's otherwise legal. if somebody horrible shows up here to spew crap, don't defederate. be as open as the rest of the open Internet. unless they bother people directly or host a server with such users and don't stop them from bothering people. I want all manner of convos and I think we can handle it well.
       
 (DIR) Post #AmKX6CPv1i8IFToPeC by jraedisch@mastodon.social
       2024-09-24T13:48:32Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wjmaggos I would maybe want to sprinkle some search filters in there, like some common conception of “safe surfing”, erring on the side of caution and easy to deactivate.It seems more probable to me though that we will keep having different open platforms. E.g. Mastodon will be for the (superficially😬) super cautious, Nostr for the reckless, BlueSky for the hip,… .
       
 (DIR) Post #AmKXMCuMy5v4PBgjpo by wjmaggos@liberal.city
       2024-09-24T13:51:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jraedisch I want one social web tho. safe surfing is good but that shouldn't be about the network content or mods but the search engine you choose imo.
       
 (DIR) Post #AmKZBIregO9jbKLa76 by jraedisch@mastodon.social
       2024-09-24T14:11:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wjmaggos if you want one open network (again: me too) there will probably be a default “safe” engine which the majority  will use.(Are you for opt-in or opt-out of your content being indexable by different search engines? If your answer is opt-out (like mine) that again might not be fediversish.)
       
 (DIR) Post #AmKaeE9HOWf1KMwkhE by wjmaggos@liberal.city
       2024-09-24T14:28:12Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jraedisch yes, opt-out. most use a safe search engine while the network is united and everybody feels they can say whatever they want as long as they aren't being an asshole seems like a great future. sometimes important things will be said or discovered by people that mostly say things better left unsaid. I want those posts to be able to go viral too.