Post AkxpMbeSFxv7srzTZg by lina@uwu.social
(DIR) More posts by lina@uwu.social
(DIR) Post #AkxkuuhHS6or1mqsNM by 7666@comp.lain.la
2024-08-14T16:12:41.714205Z
5 likes, 3 repeats
everyone in 2010 was like "not supporting IPv6 internally will bite you in 3-5 years!and then everyone in 2015 was like "not supporting IPv6 internally will bite you in 3-5 years!"and then everyone in 2020 was like "not supporting IPv6 internally will bite you in 3-5 years!"eagerly awaiting the same sentiment in 2025
(DIR) Post #AkxkyWz5YeA2dsuGES by IceCubeSoup@noauthority.social
2024-08-14T16:13:45Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@7666 NAT is the best terrible solution which has ever existed.
(DIR) Post #AkxlCKJXShXrOu3AJM by IceCubeSoup@noauthority.social
2024-08-14T16:16:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@7666 I remember when it was first introduced, and purists were losing their minds. I was swayed by their arguments at the time.
(DIR) Post #AkxlFeMrMMbSSrBj5U by 7666@comp.lain.la
2024-08-14T16:16:30.467487Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@IceCubeSoup I would still have the exact same amount of firewall rules in my router (something on the order of 500).It's just that my firewall rules would lack now lack port translation mappings too which doesn't bother me one bit.
(DIR) Post #AkxlGXlDPVlWGK0SBc by sneeden@iddqd.social
2024-08-14T16:16:56.927843Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@7666 2025 will be the year of Linux desktop AND IPv6
(DIR) Post #Akxlf7JEtOvBSsddAG by newt@stereophonic.space
2024-08-14T16:21:14.745735Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@IceCubeSoup @7666 it's not that NAT is any good. It' s that IPv6 turned out to be pretty stupid.
(DIR) Post #AkxpMbeSFxv7srzTZg by lina@uwu.social
2024-08-14T17:02:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@7666 my isp still not supporting ipv6 xddd, no address or anything, only ipv4 with nat
(DIR) Post #AkxpMcppr8cNYSK4x6 by mischievoustomato@rebased.taihou.website
2024-08-14T17:02:50.420985Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
my isp provides ipv6 enabled ootb, but not working. Either you wait for timeouts or you disable ipv6
(DIR) Post #AkxprZAjWaybAgqqoK by phnt@fluffytail.org
2024-08-14T17:08:27.170975Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@mischievoustomato @7666 @lina That's basically the whole experience non-business customers get. No residential ISP to my knowledge provide IPv6 transport to my knowledge. IPv6 transport is only available upstream of NIX in Prague. Everything downstream from NIX doesn't have IPv6.
(DIR) Post #AkyDE2eyrsjNwWgZW4 by tttie@uwu.social
2024-08-14T21:01:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@7666 might happen to be a very rare exception here - I couldn't imagine my internal network functioning correctly without IPv6.As someone who uses a phone as their uplink to the global internet, my IP addresses (both v4 and v6) are inherently unstable as my v6 prefix is re-rolled with every reconnection to the cellular network and NAT'd v4 subnets are being rerolled with every reboot of my phone. (I think new RNDIS sessions also triggered a v4 subnet reroll, but I'm not sure – I'm sure it rerolled the MAC address, and I found it so annoying to have switched to a switch with an USB Ethernet adapter instead.)mDNS could have solved the problem of accessing the machines via stable hostnames, however, there still was the problem of "what if my phone isn't connected and I need to quickly network across my machines?" to solve.Setting up a DHCPv4 server on my computer would have resulted in clashes between my computer and my phone if they're both on as everything was interconnected together on the switch. Hence, the only realistic solution I could think of at that time was to plop radvd on my computer and broadcast my own ULA prefix.Since then, I've switched over to a proper router to broadcast the prefix, still bridged together as there's no ND proxy support on Mikrotik devices 🙄However, everything works well to this day, the only downside is that I cannot use the ULA prefix on my uplink phone as foreign RAs are blocked 🤷♀️
(DIR) Post #AkyDE3BwtJ6Pam6tu4 by 7666@comp.lain.la
2024-08-14T21:29:54.527609Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tttie tunnel to a VPS solves the entirety of this
(DIR) Post #AkyVcfwuF43tv9xxDM by tttie@uwu.social
2024-08-15T00:42:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@7666 hmm, mind elaborating a bit more? I might not be seeing the big picture here I'm afraid 🤔there's no need to tunnel when the resources are on the same physical network?
(DIR) Post #AkyVcgrGrV9GjyKy4O by 7666@comp.lain.la
2024-08-15T00:56:04.923273Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tttie I meant for publishing things. A static target makes life easy.