Post AkGXhTaDISf3yAX1uK by dartov@hachyderm.io
 (DIR) More posts by dartov@hachyderm.io
 (DIR) Post #AkGVm05y9wMK3QPmuu by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
       2024-07-24T19:30:34.768215Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       i understand the appeal of the framework laptop branding and style, but if you take it at the face value, the basic premise is just idiotic? you are just going to produce a lot of trash in form of "modules" you are replacing which will have minimal resale value and won't be useful in itself, while you are going to keep structural parts which are easily recyclable, while at no point you will just have a complete laptop that can be resold and reused, if you care about waste reduction, you will non-ironically get a macbook which can be resold and reused as it is happily even a decade after manufacturing
       
 (DIR) Post #AkGXhTaDISf3yAX1uK by dartov@hachyderm.io
       2024-07-24T19:41:33Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pony I’d agree framework “modules” are a bit of a gimmick, but the rest is also open-ish and user serviceable (although to my taste I prefer to go all the way to open hardware, like MNT Reform). I’d say it’s closer to MacBooks when those had user serviceable memory, storage and battery, those were some good times.
       
 (DIR) Post #AkGXhUvsHPaA9dfqJE by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
       2024-07-24T19:52:12.813995Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dartov you can make some argument for some upgradability being a good thing, but majority of computers will probably not be upgraded beyond new storage, i am even that heretical that i believe these things don't need to be directly user-serviceable and may require some expert work