Post AjARghBVgnb4ITJVT6 by foone@digipres.club
 (DIR) More posts by foone@digipres.club
 (DIR) Post #Aj6zwaTpkwH5NXsebg by foone@digipres.club
       2024-06-20T07:28:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       wait what if you use a GPL'd art design for a tattoo?
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj707k9C9cwKXvXwVk by frederic@chaos.social
       2024-06-20T07:30:56Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone Do you have to tattoo the LICENSE file next to it? 🤔
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj70GZx5QgrlX460ie by foone@digipres.club
       2024-06-20T07:32:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I was about to do a temporary tattoo shitpost and I discovered that there's like 50 wikipedia pages embedding a broken SVG.even when I try not to Do Work, I end up having to do work
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj70OBsonhuFCVjGb2 by slyecho@mdon.ee
       2024-06-20T07:32:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone Only on arm architecture
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj70VN6LUS8c1KTqxk by swelljoe@mas.to
       2024-06-20T07:33:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone what constitutes "distributing" a tattoo? Because that's where the license kicks in with GPL.
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj70cScRNFen9zsBRA by foone@digipres.club
       2024-06-20T07:34:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @swelljoe I think I might have to license all my selfies as GPL
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj715j5DEwWEcXHm88 by curtmack@floss.social
       2024-06-20T07:41:33Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone My interpretation is that A) tattooing does not qualify as "Linking" under the GPL's definition, and B) even if it did, the person's body would qualify under the System Library exception. As such, there wouldn't be an issue, provided the tattoo artist gave the recipient a copy of the GPL and the Corresponding Source for the artwork (or a written offer to receive the Corresponding Source through some other means, for free or for a fee no greater than their cost to perform this service).
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj71EhiRh0GczDuxTU by funkylab@mastodon.social
       2024-06-20T07:43:22Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone the graphical representation is at the very most an output of the SVG program, if we really want to call it that. So, not a problem.
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj75bNmyLXSVf36XSK by h0m54r@mastodon.social
       2024-06-20T08:31:53Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone apologies if it’s one of mine
       
 (DIR) Post #Aj79rPGj0mQohVuvuy by waldi@chaos.social
       2024-06-20T09:19:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone You have to stop using anything electronic, then you might be able to stop doing work.
       
 (DIR) Post #AjA4d3actsK177Rad6 by austincnunn@weird.autos
       2024-06-21T19:03:50Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foone doesn't that only matter if you're using it for commercial works?
       
 (DIR) Post #AjARghBVgnb4ITJVT6 by foone@digipres.club
       2024-06-21T23:23:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @austincnunn Nah. GPL doesn't know or care about "commercial"