Post AiGSA67lkOnF4fMHfk by AngelicAura@pol.social
(DIR) More posts by AngelicAura@pol.social
(DIR) Post #AiGK6iz4WiLsnuAf9U by Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social
2024-05-25T21:35:54Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Do you think that Minarchism is compatible with Libertarian Communism? Minarchism advocates for a minimal state that only protects individual rights and maintains order while avoiding unnecessary intervention in the economy and personal lives of citizens. Of the research I've done, despite some ideological differences between the two, like Libertarian Communism typically advocating for a stateless society, it doesn't seem inherently contradictory for someone to hold both beliefs simultaneously.
(DIR) Post #AiGKee1bTGwVGkWsZE by whynothugo@fosstodon.org
2024-05-25T21:41:57Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom What exactly are the beliefs? These are two definitions. I believe them to be accurate. Answering the question would require clearer explanation of the beliefs.Eg: One believe that one is desirable and the other feasible, there is no contradiction.
(DIR) Post #AiGLIebUjpE0eEOYoy by Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social
2024-05-25T21:49:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@whynothugo Libertarian communism is a political ideology advocating for a stateless, classless society based on common ownership of the means of production.Minarchism is a political philosophy advocating for a minimal state that protects individual rights and maintains order.Besides Libertarian Communism advocating for a stateless society and Minarchism advocating for a minimal state, it appears that both are compatible in some respects, but I'm just trying to get other people's opinions.
(DIR) Post #AiGLcha3NddnfiHSe8 by somegirl@liberdon.com
2024-05-25T21:52:49Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom .... Obviously not, since "Libertarian Communism" obviously does not exist as a possible form of government of a country or state. In addition, all countrys or places with no government are called ANARCHIST, not "Libertarian"!
(DIR) Post #AiGM0K8OCizPu9bYQ4 by whynothugo@fosstodon.org
2024-05-25T21:57:07Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom Well, someone might think that one is the path to another and there is no contradiction on that... Although I'm not sure of I'd agree with the sentiment, I wouldn't find it contradictory.But if someone believes that both are the final, ultimate form of utopian society, then I do see a contradiction.
(DIR) Post #AiGO8rjNNPyOKN6cNM by asbestos@toot.community
2024-05-25T22:21:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom @whynothugo The issue I have with any of these types of systems is that people are assholes. True cooperative systems never seem to pan out ever, There have been cooperatives that have functioned in a larger framework but that seems to be it. Even when the members are culturally and ideologically aligned, they seem to fall apart over time. Because people are assholes, People are the reason we can't have nice things.
(DIR) Post #AiGOPt59bdFvRQPPI8 by gnoll110@ruby.social
2024-05-25T22:24:09Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom Libertarian Communism [and L Socialism] seems do be a US thing?Elsewhere the Libertarian name space is reserved by the right? US far right [lead by Fossil Fuel billionaires] is putting big money into Global Warming/science (see antivax, anti Covid protection measures etc) denying far right Libertarian movements across emerging nations. See Milei.
(DIR) Post #AiGPg9dduxojNRrSfw by Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social
2024-05-25T22:38:19Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@asbestos @whynothugo That's a hasty generalization of all of humanity. Human behavior is diverse and complex. There are a lot of bad people, but they all aren't bad, and many people are inherently inclined to engage in cooperative and altruistic behavior if placed in the right environment. You seem to think that the problem is human nature, but the true problem is human nurture and the toxic environments people are forced to live in.
(DIR) Post #AiGSA67lkOnF4fMHfk by AngelicAura@pol.social
2024-05-25T23:06:07Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom State's responsibilities would include protecting individual rights and order, whike not messing with economy?Sounds like an ideal solution for capitalists to continue exploitation on an unprecedented scale, shielded by the nebulous "order"I don't think minarchism and libertarian communism are necessarily opposed to each other, though somehow I imagine minarchists much closer to gadsden flag flying US wackos than socialists.The definition would have to put individual rights and freedoms unambiguously higher than "order", while having a robust definition of the former
(DIR) Post #ApglG5A1T5aUa3wor2 by ChristiJunior
2025-01-03T00:47:21.318461Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@AngelicAura @Radical_EgoCom I'd put the rights and freedoms of trannies and other faggot not just below "order", but below any social good imaginable.