Post AdPyMCzMdrAz957o00 by litchralee_v6@ipv6.social
 (DIR) More posts by litchralee_v6@ipv6.social
 (DIR) Post #AdPyMCzMdrAz957o00 by litchralee_v6@ipv6.social
       2024-01-01T23:58:40Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tschaefer Just... wow. This document is staggering in how it belies logic and history."If IPv4 capacity could be expanded without the CG-NAT limitations, such as size, speed and outgoing-only, the urgency due to address shortage will be relaxed long enough for the IPv6 to mature on its own pace"This is nothing less than "the beatings will continue until morale improves" in its backwards ideas. And adding *more* routers to keep legacy IP alive?? Dear me, that's misguided + tried and failed.