Post AaABElsQuUvfWaF9ge by admin@orwell.fun
(DIR) More posts by admin@orwell.fun
(DIR) Post #AaAB6p1xIkc8zLuIaG by quinn@social.circl.lu
2023-09-25T18:11:02Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I cannot see how you can nab the AI companies for training on public data without also making search engines illegal.
(DIR) Post #AaAB6pqIHasdVTSV2u by rysiek@mstdn.social
2023-09-25T18:14:11Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@quinn search engines do not produce "new content", they directly quote — word for word — scraped content.Search engines give direct, clear attribution of where a given piece of content came from.Search engines fit well within the copyright law "quote exception". "Generative AI" does not.The "generative" part is where they differ.
(DIR) Post #AaABEkHArXX0YjnsyO by admin@orwell.fun
2023-09-25T19:27:55.743854Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
And search engines save public data as is, LLM no.
(DIR) Post #AaABEkvwPy8obAsRW4 by oblomov@sociale.network
2023-09-25T20:35:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@admin @quinn @rysiek a simple way to appreciate the difference is this: you can ask a search engine to remove the data regarding a specific item, and they can comply pretty effectively. The LLM corps clearly state they cannot do this exactly.Also: a search engine has no problem stating which pages it indexes and which not. LLM corps refuse to do this.
(DIR) Post #AaABElsQuUvfWaF9ge by admin@orwell.fun
2023-09-25T21:19:38.317733Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
You generate texts too, in the same manner. It’s only your ego the difference. Culture only for humans! What racist thing.
(DIR) Post #AaABEmjFk7BEAOxL16 by rysiek@mstdn.social
2023-09-25T21:21:25Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@admin did you just use "racism" in a conversation about the difference between an output of an algorithm and the result of human creativity? Seriously? 👀 Here's some actual deep-dive on racism behind "AI" and equating algorithms to human creativity:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7XT4TWLzJw@quinn @oblomov