Post Aa5irLcylPSI6YDZ44 by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
(DIR) More posts by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
(DIR) Post #Aa5irLcylPSI6YDZ44 by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T10:15:03Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
My blunderbuss of ideas for bringing audiobooks to the Podcasting 2.0 Value4Value model. @dave @adam https://oppy1984.com/value-4-value-audiobooks/
(DIR) Post #Aa5z7x4Qv0Qk8Czy76 by ChrisLAS@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T14:56:50Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@oppy1984 Love this idea Oppy!
(DIR) Post #Aa67Yv716gGpVfZrii by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T16:31:23Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ChrisLAS Thank you!
(DIR) Post #Aa6jaTApkTn7hJWpsG by errhead@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T15:41:57Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@oppy1984 @dave @adam I too have been pondering thisOn the financing side, I prefer a more V4V model. The main change I would make from the standard podcast V4V is to bring up a dialog at the end of the book, suggesting a boostagram. The amount of the boost and the text appearing as a cross app comment would make for a very effective quick review. Since there's no paywall, downloading is trivially easy, and an important option for mobile apps which may be out of network coverage at times.
(DIR) Post #Aa6jaU4qOEauV1jZB2 by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T16:28:56Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@errhead @dave @adam I agree a pure V4V model would be ideal but authors might not be willing to upload if they can’t guarantee a minimum price. But there could be an option for the author to select a fixed price or pay what you want even if it’s zero. Users could then choose to pay afterwards.I love the idea of a dialog at the end of the book to prompt a review with the user able to set their own amount. Though I do feel there should be a minimum amount, say 200 Sats?
(DIR) Post #Aa6jaUpzYwJArFnDfM by errhead@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T16:39:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@oppy1984 @dave @adam > say 200 Sats?I'd say author configurable.I'd argue if you really hated a book a 1 sat review has a certain zing to it :)And a million sat review both pays the author's team and shows a high level of satisfaction with the workFeel free, anything I post is public domain, no rights reserved.
(DIR) Post #Aa6jaVbUiKJ1Ea19hw by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T16:46:58Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@errhead @dave @adam I’ll be honest I hadn’t thought of it that way, as soon as I read this I thought of one book in particular that I would have given a 1 Sat review of due to how bad it was. Yep I’m on board with this now, no minimum for comments.Thanks, I'll update the post.
(DIR) Post #Aa6jaWLDyIsxWPPfzE by adam@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T23:37:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@oppy1984 @errhead @dave Please review the V4V model. Value4Value.infoIn the model, 3-4% will send value. Most will return nothing. Setting minimums and such breaks the model. The creator CAN NOT determine what value the receiver places on the product, or the size of their wallet. It can be scary as a creator, bitnit is the only way. The "ask" is critical. How do you propose that work in audio books?
(DIR) Post #Aa6jaXTlk1JZ3CQ0wa by errhead@podcastindex.social
2023-09-24T16:31:33Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@oppy1984 @dave @adamSome fun ui differences for the audiobook medium, comments should either be hidden by default until the chapter is finished, or display the previous chapter's comments.
(DIR) Post #Aa7Yvl0dj7s8l0fVya by oppy1984@podcastindex.social
2023-09-25T09:12:40Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@adam @errhead @dave This is where the get it out quickly method failed me, I was jumping around sections while thinking how to continue in other sections and totally forgot the V4V section of Financing.The Financing section has been updated with the explanation. I admit, it's not perfect, but I can't think of a better option right now. I hope this will spark an idea in someone else that will solve the problem.I knew you'd bring the valuable critical eye to this, thank you.