Post AZGYB6yAhY2fHcOpd2 by janl@narrativ.es
 (DIR) More posts by janl@narrativ.es
 (DIR) Post #AZGXwYFez8U5YMdY1I by tante@tldr.nettime.org
       2023-08-30T19:21:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Just to keep the Masto/Fediverse spirit going with a meta post:The amount of activity on a post (replies, repost, likes) here is significantly higher that I ever had it on Twitter. Which is a bit surprising TBH.
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGYB6yAhY2fHcOpd2 by janl@narrativ.es
       2023-08-30T19:24:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante your game improved ;P
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGYK0ImrOvXD7HZlA by tante@tldr.nettime.org
       2023-08-30T19:26:08Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @janl I do not think so TBH. But it is nice of you to say so
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGYmqdrr4BheGter2 by enmodo@mastodon.social
       2023-08-30T19:31:19Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante I never had a significant following on Twitter so it's good news to hear that from someone with circa 10K followers here and over 30K there.  But from my own meager following here and there (both about 300 - at least before I terminated my Twitter account) I feel like the quality of interactions is a lot higher here.  Whether we sustain that as we grow, who knows.  There's definitely an "early adopter" bias now, our limited numbers mean blowhards and trolls don't find it as attractive.
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGYwjrttUe9XJB1Ki by jonas_w@chaos.social
       2023-08-30T19:32:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante why do you think it’s suprising? Because of a difference in the amount of followers? I think with a chronological timeline like here the post is seen by a lot more people than with an algorithmic timeline. At least as long as the post doesn’t pass the threshold to be pushed to random people by the algorithm
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGaRpbqhNQcH03hfU by CatherineFlick@mastodon.me.uk
       2023-08-30T19:49:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante have also found this!
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGbfdktfVK7W6RIIK by davidak@chaos.social
       2023-08-30T20:03:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante that's also my experience.
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGdmUUmh82OjWIU2y by AlexVoss@fosstodon.org
       2023-08-30T20:27:12Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante less of „that‘s interest… oh, look, a squirrel?“
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGdqMefmsYFZgllmS by WesternExposure@mastodon.ie
       2023-08-30T20:27:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante Can concur.
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGduJO9sDuqbPvXYO by tante@tldr.nettime.org
       2023-08-30T20:27:48Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @AlexVoss I really don't know why. Maybe more people than I thought used Twitter Algorithm?
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGepPqwVoLZ9ocVtY by elottermann@kirche.social
       2023-08-30T20:38:56Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante @AlexVoss It Maybe most users don't even know what a Twitter algorithm is?
       
 (DIR) Post #AZHsTbBxGb4uTBtp3Y by AlexVoss@fosstodon.org
       2023-08-31T10:46:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante I did not know that it was optional?
       
 (DIR) Post #AZHuVk13d4SkKDx3Oi by tante@tldr.nettime.org
       2023-08-31T11:09:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @AlexVoss yeah there was a "following" that only showed you people you follow in reverse chronological order (what a weird idea)