Post AYa0J0DFRdheQHbprs by boredomdenied@gigaohm.bio
 (DIR) More posts by boredomdenied@gigaohm.bio
 (DIR) Post #AYa0J0DFRdheQHbprs by boredomdenied@gigaohm.bio
       2023-08-09T17:59:58.299185Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       If that's really Mike's channel @tedb , well, it looks like he's fully on board the depopulation train:https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/10/30/the-club-of-rome-the-cia-depopulation-program-at-faucis-fort-detrick/I don't really think it's about reducing the population 90%. Looks like this is a step-down agenda where you throw out an agent, and assess over the following years, then throw out the next. First stabilizing, then dropping the population in a way that civilization continues to keep on a keepin' on. We're at least half a century away before these guys could do without the bulk of us in my assessment.
       
 (DIR) Post #AYa0J13MJtO31tzS5o by tedb@gigaohm.bio
       2023-08-10T06:47:14.487380Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       the last post in that channel with this link seems to be critical of this article not onboard with it https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon/1559
       
 (DIR) Post #AYbuOTLwJpVoq3osKm by boredomdenied@gigaohm.bio
       2023-08-10T17:47:29.154091Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I don’t think this is correct. He’s critical of those who claim it’s necessary. The article is against the agenda. Allow me to clarify, I think he’s fully on board with the idea being realistic. Not that he’s in favor of that course of action.He used to keep it to, ” your government is trying to kill you “. Now he’s a bit more aggressive in his stance. Not that I really disagree at this point. I think the deaths are seen as fortunate for some and unfortunate to others. I think this is a secondary outcome and not the primary objective.