Post AYUtf4ZYFGUGqUoogy by DaleHagglund@hachyderm.io
 (DIR) More posts by DaleHagglund@hachyderm.io
 (DIR) Post #AYUoUI07Tj2lXNHhJo by mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
       2023-08-07T18:39:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Hahahahaha yes, YES I grabbed the debuginfo for librpm.so.8, disassembled it, then binary patched it to change the maximum signature block size and now rpm is happy
       
 (DIR) Post #AYUowxOLBNHS15HdHU by mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
       2023-08-07T18:44:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Despite rationally knowing that this would obviously work, I cannot believe that this worked
       
 (DIR) Post #AYUpQtv8eUJnwGu252 by mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
       2023-08-07T18:49:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Booo "rpmlib(CaretInVersions) <= 4.15.0-1 is needed by" well ok that's something that was only introduced into rpm a couple of years after my build let's see if I can work around that
       
 (DIR) Post #AYUqp1VEDIWkMHqk4W by whitequark@mastodon.social
       2023-08-07T19:05:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 it's quite fun isn't it? I know someone who can patch proprietary and often embedded (so, no debuginfo) binaries as easily as breathing, and it's really something to watch
       
 (DIR) Post #AYUtf4ZYFGUGqUoogy by DaleHagglund@hachyderm.io
       2023-08-07T19:37:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 It's always a blast when you solve your problem by editing the binary
       
 (DIR) Post #AYV5pHQ8WuWZ2V34ZU by FritzAdalis@infosec.exchange
       2023-08-07T21:52:18Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59You, sir, are a madman.
       
 (DIR) Post #AYV6MuU8JHajkfxCls by arclight@oldbytes.space
       2023-08-07T22:00:08Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 Noice!