Post AXlavguDb6cJoxclwu by ffg@a2mi.social
 (DIR) More posts by ffg@a2mi.social
 (DIR) Post #AXlULSBQG61e0g0cDY by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T21:53:32.114326Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Well that's sad https://www.phoronix.com/news/AlmaLinux-No-1-1-RHEL
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlUZGZSEJrw35ptWC by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T21:56:02.233062Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       are we approaching an Ubuntu/Debian monopoly or will other distros make it alive :blobcatthink: (might or might not be an opportunity for aspirants to get a hold as well)
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlUcCg99nMaqYMoDY by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T21:56:33.749964Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       are we approaching an Ubuntu/Debian monopoly or will other distro families make it alive :blobcatthink: (might or might not be an opportunity for aspirants to get a hold of the corporate market as well)
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlUxDFcE1MQhayWGW by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T22:00:21.136838Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @cwebber totally not what I was thinking of :blobcatsip:
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlV8Louhla8SsnS52 by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T22:02:17.003881Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @roobre al parecer hay bastante interés en rolling releases incluso, lo importante es que hayan empresas cargándose la responsabilidad de ofrecer soporte... otra cosa es lo del track record, que aunque la distro tenga décadas de ser estable puede que no importe hasta que pasen unos añitos de pruebas
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlY5vQg9dBJtkzoWW by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T22:35:34.271160Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @thenoid Having Oracle on our side… alright, guess we’re doing everything wrong :blobcatderpy:
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlYuBmjcOIT6VHQVk by frumble@chaos.social
       2023-07-16T22:33:53Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xerz Have you read this?https://quantum-integration.org/the-curse-of-bug-to-bug-compatibility
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlYuELu4bcJ49kXbc by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T22:44:35.924536Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @frumble I didn't, but now I have ‒ and honestly? it's exactly what I expected :blobcatthink: I think the argument against the concept of bug-to-bug is just plain wrong (obviously the idea is that if I install an up-to-date fork of RHEL with the same configuration I'll get the same state as actual RHEL, right?), but I also get why ABI compatibility sounds betterdoesn't matter, they're still borderline locking down RHEL source code and people want to ensure they get basically the exact same thing because of compatibility expectations (which could get bad in the future even with ABI compatibility if the guidelines stop being encompassing enough) :blobcatderpy:
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlavguDb6cJoxclwu by ffg@a2mi.social
       2023-07-16T23:04:41Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xerz I hate to say it, but it will largely depend on what commercial ISVs decide to do, at least in my corner of the industry (CAE)
       
 (DIR) Post #AXlayk40JTkGU2ekwS by xerz@fedi.xerz.one
       2023-07-16T23:07:47.389333Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ffg I think you're definitely not far off...