Post AXJX1rYcPlR8khFTdY by syklemil@snabelen.no
 (DIR) More posts by syklemil@snabelen.no
 (DIR) Post #AXJX1i9pMZG5bCa3FI by jon@gruene.social
       2023-07-03T09:40:46Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       There was a line in one of those Pew internet reports a decade or so agoHow many Americans knew what Twitter and Facebook were? And how many had used them?The answers were (from memory as I can’t find the damned report):Knew of itFacebook 98%Twitter 97%Had used itFacebook 60%Twitter 20%Limit seeing things on Twitter to only those with accounts… and you see why that’s a very bad idea.
       
 (DIR) Post #AXJX1rYcPlR8khFTdY by syklemil@snabelen.no
       2023-07-03T09:59:55Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @jon Yeah, twitter was always the biggest of the small fish, so to say. Its pros were that the users it did have were a higher proportion of important figures.But now, who's going to stay on twitter for exposure? Even if someone has a paid account, links to their tweets can't be shared with people without accounts any more, and their followers might not see posts because they're rate limited.
       
 (DIR) Post #AXJX2K3mRV059S2l60 by filiplachert@mastodon.social
       2023-07-03T10:06:33Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @syklemil @jon no more "articles" consisting od tweets? That cant be a nad thing