Post AXDcconWyFrXjMuBXM by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
 (DIR) More posts by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
 (DIR) Post #AXDcZcvUeWaG2j6kSW by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
       2023-06-30T13:45:14.278645Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       > W związku z rozmieszczeniem rosyjskiej broni jądrowej na Białorusi, zwracamy się do całego @NATO, by Polska wzięła udziału w programie Nuclear Sharing; deklarujemy wolę szybkiego działania w tej sprawie  - @MorawieckiMcould you please consider buying one more type of tanks
       
 (DIR) Post #AXDcconWyFrXjMuBXM by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
       2023-06-30T13:45:24.859896Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       instead of this
       
 (DIR) Post #AXDdML0Y3t3gewhQcS by instereo256@realworldsunny.name
       2023-06-30T13:49:35.408Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz @NATO@blovice.bahnhof.cz @MorawieckiM@blovice.bahnhof.cz i don't understand polish well, uh.. they want another NATO country to deploy nuclear weapons in poland because russia has deployed nuclear weapons in belarus
       
 (DIR) Post #AXDdMLZdxP8CPn7SK0 by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
       2023-06-30T13:54:04.443118Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @instereo256 kinda, it's more about some country providing nukes (most likely the US) that would be located in Poland, but there would be little US personnel except for some super specialized maintenance and some military police, the polish army would train to use them and it case things, uh, happen, US will just hand over the key to the bunker and be like, ok, here you go
       
 (DIR) Post #AXDe4Wux8uduL39eIy by instereo256@realworldsunny.name
       2023-06-30T13:57:56.983Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz "we shouldn't pursue development of nuclear weapons because more countries having weapons of mass destruction is bad" but in reversealso i'm sure any nukes that some NATO country might have are probably almost half a century old, if they wanted to give them such weapons in the first place of course
       
 (DIR) Post #AXDe4XiaAOLEoyNHf6 by pony@blovice.bahnhof.cz
       2023-06-30T14:02:01.513601Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @instereo256 it's a trick for countries like germany to have some (rather limited[1]) nuclear weapons while kinda sorta adhering to the treaty[1] it's very few bombs and it's almost certainly the "current" US "main" nuke, the B61, which can be configured in multiple ways, it's still manufactured as new actually, but even the maximum yield is low-ish, like, ten times hiroshima, but that's very much on the low side compared to megatons of the proper height of the cold war stuff