Post AX2tpEykX6B6pIQcd6 by AIaYYAle4i1uKmKpqy.gme@bofh.social
 (DIR) More posts by AIaYYAle4i1uKmKpqy.gme@bofh.social
 (DIR) Post #AX2tpEykX6B6pIQcd6 by AIaYYAle4i1uKmKpqy.gme@bofh.social
       2023-06-25T09:36:59.005638Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neil At minimum it’s untenable.Instances push their content to remote instances.It’s going to be hard to say, “Facebook can’t do anything with this data that I’m willingly sending to them.”
       
 (DIR) Post #AX30n0N6ZQKccghYYq by codefolio@ruby.social
       2023-06-25T09:29:04Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neil It's hard to imagine any plan working that requires a random Mastodon instance admin to successfully sue Meta over breach of their terms of use, which Meta never explicitly agreed to.I'm not saying it's impossible that they'd be in the right, legally speaking. I'm saying the amount of legal fees involved would be utterly unworkable.
       
 (DIR) Post #AX33Ngi8paPAGlA1QG by penguin42@mastodon.org.uk
       2023-06-25T11:24:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neil I think you'd end up having to have agreements between servers to follow each others rules; so then you end up with islands each with disperate sets of rules.