Post AVbGDISDPiseXJOApk by dbrand666@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by dbrand666@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #AValhQ1Ike7a6sgR7I by varx@infosec.exchange
       2023-05-12T18:00:58Z
       
       5 likes, 12 repeats
       
       Good news! .zip and .mov are now TLDs, not just file extensions! So mentioning archive.zip in chat may now link to a phishing site or something.Wait no, that's *bad* news...
       
 (DIR) Post #AValhQrPctnyiV43LE by tschaefer@ipv6.social
       2023-05-12T22:01:54Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx 🤦Sometimes I want back the 90s.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbBkd8H3NuuSF8Xom by lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
       2023-05-13T02:53:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx Those sound like two high priority candidates for the TLD blocklists.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbGDISDPiseXJOApk by dbrand666@mastodon.social
       2023-05-13T03:43:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tschaefer @varx You mean when .com still meant executable?
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbKK5EbMVI9NdVrHs by a@quey.la
       2023-05-13T04:29:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx lol
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbj61VCwHO0bZfl8C by reto@pleroma.labrat.space
       2023-05-13T09:07:27.703931Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx If only there was a trivial way to differentiate a URL from a random word, I don't know one could have added a protocol identifier. Could call it a scheme or something.Oh, wait:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.1
       
 (DIR) Post #AVblJFMsti27HXDFMe by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
       2023-05-13T09:32:12Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @varx The bad news is that some chats transform anything which looks like a domain name into a hyperlink. That was a stupid idea from the beginning, and it still is.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbqr80lFvty57q8Tg by alexelcu@social.alexn.org
       2023-05-13T10:34:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx .doc and .pdf are next 🙂And .exe would probably be useful for educating people.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVc3DGjogpbuy4EpMG by didek@101010.pl
       2023-05-13T12:52:56Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx The links should start with https://, gemini://, sftp:// prefixes in the first place.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVcKegoLYbyys61B0y by varx@infosec.exchange
       2023-05-13T16:08:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @didek Maybe if we turn enough things into domain names, people will stop autolinking things that don't have a URL scheme... :-P
       
 (DIR) Post #AVcxjYxW4iDyB9cbnE by deBaer@chaos.social
       2023-05-13T09:35:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx So, just avoid using .zip and .mov extensions. .lha and .flv are great alternatives.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVcxjZswdCA53GUTJ2 by m0xee@social.librem.one
       2023-05-13T23:26:07Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @deBaerI'd go with .arj and .3gp 🤣Also waiting for .bat TLD. Visit my blog at https://autoexec.batI wonder if there is command.com? 🤔 @varx
       
 (DIR) Post #AVeqVzL0tJ6qZh71Bw by pmevzek@framapiaf.org
       2023-05-14T21:14:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer @varx https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#appendix-C gives rough guidelines, but no user will bother all the time adding <> or URL:
       
 (DIR) Post #AVfc473FPlx8BmZmHQ by bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr
       2023-05-15T06:07:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pmevzek @varx Turning an URL into a hyperlink even if it not between brackets is reasonable. I was talking about domain names.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVfcQcTNGsji0mWqB6 by tyil@fedi.tyil.nl
       2023-05-15T06:11:38.122Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @varx@infosec.exchange The commercialization of TLDs was yet another mistake in the lifespan of the Internet.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVg0KlwlX2SWYc1MR6 by pmevzek@framapiaf.org
       2023-05-15T10:39:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer @varx Same idea could be used. <example.com> vs example.com