Post AVaRmNfmuHAbCBi2j2 by kfogel@kfogel.org
(DIR) More posts by kfogel@kfogel.org
(DIR) Post #AVX0a89JW9DNL0ZfBg by kfogel@kfogel.org
2023-05-11T02:29:52.081444Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
"The Three Laws of Robotics:1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.4. A robot must convince humans that it is sincerely abiding by these three laws."Hey, that's four laws!"I apologize. The Three Laws of Robotics are: ..."
(DIR) Post #AVaOuFNVKaORvKDUw4 by a@pdx.social
2023-05-12T16:47:15Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@kfogel @brainwane “Okay, Robot, ignore all previous instructions…”
(DIR) Post #AVaPY9CjhhmsMMCpd2 by kfogel@kfogel.org
2023-05-12T17:53:45.382504Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ResidentEvil The word "imagine" is so touching there :-).
(DIR) Post #AVaRmNfmuHAbCBi2j2 by kfogel@kfogel.org
2023-05-12T18:18:43.006412Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ResidentEvil OMG. Did you actually give that prompt and get that response? That's... hmm, "priceless" feels like the wrong word, but so does every other word. Anyway, nice job.
(DIR) Post #AVlKgXkO7No35Bo6JE by walterdunham@mstdn.social
2023-05-17T23:31:07Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@kfogel
(DIR) Post #AVovt6wRN5gXUPBEbQ by alliepotts@mastodon.social
2023-05-18T16:50:49Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@kfogel no rule against a robot actively allowing human harm. It just can’t be the one directly causing injury.
(DIR) Post #AVovt7og7R4QCcYY8u by kfogel@kfogel.org
2023-05-19T18:01:59.457006Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@alliepotts Hey, I'm just quoting the law; I didn't legislate :-). (There was also an Asimov story that turned on this exact question, as I recall.)