Post AVXkshfwlXwscndGfw by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
 (DIR) More posts by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
 (DIR) Post #AVWcrLKhMAPgFVZeE4 by Dan_Ramos@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-10T22:04:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       WTH?https://stopworldcontrol.com/children/https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1656419566900355073
       
 (DIR) Post #AVWecQlT4xHaez71OK by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-10T22:23:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Dan_Ramos hint: Malone is a nutcase
       
 (DIR) Post #AVWerY3yE3pddhyWoq by DaemonFools@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-10T22:26:32Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @incoherentmumblings @Dan_Ramos They didn't go that far, but you can see that position from where they landed.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVWf0u5ngpvCZLIBCC by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-10T22:28:13Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DaemonFools @Dan_Ramos you can see that position from anywhere, if you really want to and try hard enough.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVWf3bW9CxE1pPu4wq by SirenSabotage@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-10T22:28:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Dan_Ramos this is fake news. That's what I'd like to hear. But this goes in line with some weird things being removed from bills here in the states. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF1655&version=0&session=ls93&session_year=2023&session_number=0
       
 (DIR) Post #AVWlrYKfvJSO9cjoci by DaemonFools@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-10T23:44:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @incoherentmumblings @Dan_Ramos https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/un-report-implies-pedophilia-should-be-decriminalised/>Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVWmbJKQ2ZwowNRAbA by Dan_Ramos@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-10T23:53:14Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DaemonFools @incoherentmumblings Freaky, it doesn't look like you had to try very hard.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVXkshfwlXwscndGfw by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-11T11:08:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DaemonFools @Dan_Ramos sounds sensible to me. Most people i know had consensual sexual experiences before they were 18. Should they all be considered criminals?
       
 (DIR) Post #AVXl0rYJvYVLZfxK2S by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-11T11:10:09Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Dan_Ramos @DaemonFools Freaky, it doesn't look like you you needed a lot of imagination to spread the fake news that you did.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVXrjZw2sGmVgvl4xE by DaemonFools@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-11T12:25:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @incoherentmumblings @Dan_Ramos If they meant 'between minors' they could have written it that way. If they meant between minors and those recently minors (Jack and Jill laws) they could have been marginally less ambiguous. They weren't and im tired of word play. If they didn't want it to say what it says then I invite them to pull it down and release v1.1 when the lawyers are done. They won't so I'll keep my interpretation.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVYKFcmgc9zEVjRwnY by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-11T17:44:59Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DaemonFools @Dan_Ramos It's not as ambiguous as you think it is and it makes plenty of sense.Stop seeing pedophiles in offices everywhere.If it is actually, really consensual and the person is mature enough to make that call, it's none of anyone's business, end of story. And they are saying nothing else.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVYKrV4FklB9a9j8AC by DaemonFools@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-11T17:51:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @incoherentmumblings @Dan_Ramos >If it is actually, really consensual and the person is mature enough to make that call…That if is pregnant, which is why we have explicit rules with reasonable exceptions.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVYSPSmjRgm61mfp0S by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-11T19:07:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DaemonFools @Dan_Ramos Wait what? No that if is not pregnant, that if is IF it is CONSENSUAL. Half of the people in question can't even get pregnant. Pregnancy has nothing to do with this. Contraceptives exist and someone mature enough to make that call is mature enough to know about contraceptives. Unless, of course, they live in a place where conservative idiots prevent them from learning about such an elementary thing.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVYSPTIHYO0nbdR1BQ by DaemonFools@noagendasocial.com
       2023-05-11T19:16:25Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @incoherentmumblings @Dan_Ramos https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/pregnant-with-somethingYour statement was:IF (consent) AND IF (able to give (consent))We can debate that second one all day long with regard to minors. It is not simple.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVYSZYvDU3WHxNSR8q by incoherentmumblings@social.dev-wiki.de
       2023-05-11T19:18:14Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DaemonFools @Dan_Ramos Ecxactly. And none of that has anything to do with pregnancy and it is very much adressed in the text that you quoted here, the one that OP and Malone distorted beyond recognition.