Post AVHs2SLphdWaZoApma by didek@101010.pl
 (DIR) More posts by didek@101010.pl
 (DIR) Post #AVHKdL4ELm40G7M7Cy by bart@sociabl.be
       2023-05-03T09:10:26Z
       
       1 likes, 2 repeats
       
       Is there a petition somewhere to remove "Google Safe Browsing" from Firefox? I would like to sign it, if so.#YunoHost
       
 (DIR) Post #AVHs2SLphdWaZoApma by didek@101010.pl
       2023-05-03T19:13:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bart Can we remove Google founded web, please?
       
 (DIR) Post #AVK82hHw9bZkUCPMcy by Gautgaut@toot.aquilenet.fr
       2023-05-03T20:46:01Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bart @yunohost @arn_fai @ChatonsOrg @Framasoft @federationfdn @LaQuadrature @digitalcourage @ff7 Never heard of a petition, but I know a bunch of people and collectives that would probably support or participate if someone would start a lawsuit against Google Safe Browsing Abuses. ;)
       
 (DIR) Post #AVK82iGCXXmVV6bUYq by digitalcourage@digitalcourage.social
       2023-05-03T20:58:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Gautgaut @bart @yunohost @arn_fai @ChatonsOrg @Framasoft @federationfdn @LaQuadrature @ff7 Has anyone documented those abuses? /c
       
 (DIR) Post #AVK82izDq9nHkjfRjc by Gautgaut@toot.aquilenet.fr
       2023-05-03T21:17:05Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @digitalcourage @bart @yunohost @Framasoft @federationfdn @ff7 This thread would be the best starting point I guess: https://forum.yunohost.org/t/google-flags-my-sites-as-dangerous-deceptive-site-ahead/20361/18We would need to find appropriate charges. At @arn_fai we couldn't find a lawyer to have a look yet. Though we already contacted @LaQuadrature  about the topic. Several hosters in the @ChatonsOrg encountered the issue. https://forum.chatons.org/t/rex-google-site-trompeur-ecran-rouge-pendant-4-jours
       
 (DIR) Post #AVMc7EEL0KRSkkimOm by Blort@social.tchncs.de
       2023-05-03T17:28:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bart"Google safe browsing" should really be renamed "Google controlled browsing". No matter which popular browser used, Google alone chooses what pages are blocked with frightening messages about malware/phishing.Sure, you can switch it off on your own browser, but if you run a site, you have no control over the browser of all your visitors. So when Google decides that they don't like Yunohost (or any other webapp) you're basically screwed.#privacy #selfhosting #google #GoogleSafeBrowsing
       
 (DIR) Post #AVMc7Eqchz4CfUdM4e by bart@sociabl.be
       2023-05-04T07:04:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Blort For what it's worth and as far as I understand, #Firefox  actually uses the "Update API" of Google Safe Browsing, which means it periodically updates a local copy of the list, so Google doesn't see the URL that is checked.https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Safe_Browsing/V4_Implementation
       
 (DIR) Post #AVMc7FXW8VNUoWhbvs by Blort@social.tchncs.de
       2023-05-05T22:34:55Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bart Good to know. I've updated the original post to reflect this, although it's still far too much control by Google in even "non-Google" browsers as to what pages people see, vs what pages are replaced with alarming warning messages that have a demonstrated pattern of being false, but scaring people away from independently hosted #Yunohost sites. Having had a business page false flagged by Google before, the reputation damage was incalculable.