Post AUmp1mBAAtmc1GPRSq by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
 (DIR) More posts by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1jMOefzDHEds3c by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:41:33Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       #GeorgiaInvestigation #FunReadingLegalDocuments Okay a new filing in the Fani Willis matter. It's here: https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/View/1905/SPGJ-MOTION-TO-DISQUALIFY-ATTY-KIMBERLY-BOURROUGHS-DEBROWh/t to @bjornivarsson for alerting me.Shall we read it together? 🤓 As we learn from the title, Fani Willis seeks to disqualify attorney Kimberly Burroughs Debrow in her simultaneous representation of multiple parties and prohibit her from any further participation in this matter.That's lawyer talk for: "something juicy happened."1/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1jt0hQ4euNtutM by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:43:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The motion is brought under Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6, 1.7, and 1.9That means we have to stop to look up those rules. That's a double 🤓  🤓 .In the age of Google, it's easy: https://www.gabar.org/barrules/georgia-rules-of-professional-conduct.cfm1.6: says that lawyers shall maintain in confidence all information gained in the professional relationship with a client. 1.7 A lawyer shall not continue representation if there is a conflict of interest.2/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1kTWVfHUjcz4nw by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:46:25Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       1.8: A lawyer shall not use information gained in the professional relationship with a client to the disadvantage . . .so we obviously have a conflict going on. But this isn't just a motion to prevent multiple representation. The motion is to prohibit Debrow from continuing in this matter.Which means Willis is accusing her of doing something really bad.Let's just skip to to the statement of facts to find out what happened . . . 3/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1l0UX5eWNsPPBw by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:49:07Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Holly A. Pierson and Kimberly Bourroughs Debrow were retained to simultaneously represent 11 people who signed false certifications. Basically, the fake electors.Apparently some of these electors would receive offers of immunity. The Court did not order the DA to reveal which electors could potentially receive immunity from prosecution. Instead, the Court instructed Pierson and Debrow to extend a blanket offer of immunity to each to gauge each elector’s interest.4/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1lSqpeKznpg3Oa by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:50:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       On August 5, Pierson and Debrow reported that none of their clients were interested in offers of immunity.On October 3, Willis filed a motion to disqualify Pierson and Debrow in their simultaneous representation of the above 11 persons. November 30: The court ruled that Pierson and Dubrow could represent Shafer or the other ten electors, but not both.They agreed that Pierson would represent Shafer and Debrow would represent the others.So they split up. 5/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1mBAAtmc1GPRSq by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:52:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Finally we get to the good part.According to Willis: "This situation reached an impracticable and ethical mess as events the past week have shown."Apparently, on April 12th and 14th, the DA’s office intervewed the electors and learned that they were never presented with offers of immunity.Ooops.That's really bad.They didn't present the offers of immunity and lied about it.🛎️ UNETHICAL 🛎️ 6/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1n1H39T0csn3gm by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T18:55:03Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       And that's not all.The DA's office, during these interviews, also learned that one of the electors engaged in "acts that are violations of GA law" and that the others were not party to these additional acts. I'm reading as fast as I can and I don't see what this additional act was. But I don't see it. It doesn't look like the illegal act was revealed here.7/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1nQnWFspu2jRTM by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T19:02:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Okay, so what we learn is that some of these electors would like immunity, which means they are willing to spill everything they know (it also means they are not stupid and don't want to fall on their swords to try to save Trump.)We also learn that one of the electors did something else in violation of GA laws, and the other electors are informing the DA's office.Willis wants Debrow entirely removed from the case, not just precluded from simultaneous representation.Well, well, well.8/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUmp1o7Ky5uY1ydPmK by Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online
       2023-04-18T19:12:14Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       This, by the way, is why these things take time. Prosecutors need to get to the bottom of things, and with a corrupt organization, it isn't easy.I don't know anything about these lawyers but they were obviously not acting in the best interests of their clients. They were acting in the best interest of Trump and whoever was behind the fake elector scheme.With a corrupt organization (and I think we can call the Trump-GOP that) you want the foot soldiers turning on the generals.9/
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnEWyhk9XvohJcimG by Bodo@mindly.social
       2023-04-19T00:29:25Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield a great number of lawyers sadly have their best interest in mind even before the clients they represent. Greed is the motivating factor for far too many lawyers. Of course, there are many amazing and highly ethical lawyers as well.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnGqWEjuAxI6eVECO by quotesofnote@zirk.us
       2023-04-19T00:55:16Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield Thank you so much for reading the filing through with/for us!
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnGu1EZ7Akn6x5eYS by quotesofnote@zirk.us
       2023-04-19T00:55:58Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield Thank you so much for reading through the filing with/for us!
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnKKDysdyrm2LwPFw by AlgoCompSynth@ravenation.club
       2023-04-19T01:34:19Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield Nobody wants to fall on their sword for conspiracy to defraud the United States either.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnPp0YB80zP88wvZo by Homoevolutis0@geekdom.social
       2023-04-19T02:35:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield The fake electors are squealing big.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnQacAr3sMLQejz3w by 12thRITS@mstdn.social
       2023-04-19T02:44:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield @bjornivarsson Great thread. MSNBC is talling about this tonight.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUnSf9eqiAOOLN3xgm by draudreyglover@mstdn.social
       2023-04-19T03:07:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Teri_Kanefield @bjornivarsson I love it when Terri says “shall we read it together”. I know I am about to learn something….(rubbing hands together in glee)