Post AUIw60DLGUara3eEwC by brecht@social.coop
(DIR) More posts by brecht@social.coop
(DIR) Post #AUIsbHGxUcSLe8ztYG by tante@tldr.nettime.org
2023-04-04T09:02:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
This is 100% factually correct.(https://twitter.com/edzitron/status/1642989238575837184 )
(DIR) Post #AUIu9hTkfGiEiwxWRk by guerda@ruhr.social
2023-04-04T09:19:41Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tante I like that statement. I would boost your post but not without the alt text.
(DIR) Post #AUIv4IrUrXh0sk3X84 by tante@tldr.nettime.org
2023-04-04T09:29:56Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@guerda There is alt text on the image:
(DIR) Post #AUIw60DLGUara3eEwC by brecht@social.coop
2023-04-04T09:41:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tante The twist being that if ChatGPT can satifactorily execute your idea, it probably wasn't anything special in the first place.
(DIR) Post #AUIwqjQzTBrF9JJXuq by guerda@ruhr.social
2023-04-04T09:49:52Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tante Oh, I'm sorry, I couldn't make it out in the web interface.
(DIR) Post #AUJFPWCmRhonQiP9zU by smicur@mastodon.gamedev.place
2023-04-04T13:17:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tante "I'm in this photo and I don't like it"
(DIR) Post #AUJV5Equqr2f5QWtn6 by FTWynn@fosstodon.org
2023-04-04T16:13:27Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tante I like this interpretation because it cuts through the hype and gets to the next problem. I don't see a lot of AIs working with existing code bases, or untangling spaghetti code. You know... the *hard part*