Post AU9DFQ0itHvOAedkFU by tschaefer@ipv6.social
 (DIR) More posts by tschaefer@ipv6.social
 (DIR) Post #AU9CSOUjjpcNHPImyO by miyuru@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T16:12:31Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Looks like my backup ISP is deploying #NAT64 😍 #IPv6
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9CSPHIpGSxi21Zfk by tschaefer@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T16:57:42Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @miyuru is 2402:d000::cafe the normal dns resolver by your ISP?Can you ping the translated destinations?
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9DFQ0itHvOAedkFU by tschaefer@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T17:06:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @miyuru mobile, wifi-hotspot or dsl/cable/fiber?
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9DffkN0SAmVNVfma by miyuru@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T17:11:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tschaefer mine is DSL, but they have it on fiber as well.(checked with a friend)They are still AB testing. Only some queries get the DNS64 and GitHub has already blocked the NAT64 endpoint IPv4 address.
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9PsrDcreTLIbFPU0 by tschaefer@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T19:28:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @miyuru GitHub must be stupid, but it wouldn't be the first , where firewall rules are wrong. Proxies, CGN/NAT64 endpoints ... don't behave like users behind single public ipv4 addresses.
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9Q2nIYIOQg2GI2gS by olifantoliver@norden.social
       2023-03-30T18:19:07Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @miyuru @tschaefer What do you mean, they blocked it? Maybe they should try to deploy IPv6 then. 🙃
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9Q2nyjlYAo961jRA by tschaefer@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T19:29:58Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @olifantoliver @miyuru They should. But, as long they don't provide AAAA, DNS64 does.
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9QIkZmBUqyE4xGL2 by miyuru@ipv6.social
       2023-03-30T19:32:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tschaefer late adopter problems.