Post ATFxRePSYWqPR5CyPo by GreenFire@climatejustice.social
 (DIR) More posts by GreenFire@climatejustice.social
 (DIR) Post #ATFwuiOohZ0eFlCcue by arstechnica@geeknews.chat
       2023-03-04T01:11:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       WHO “deeply frustrated” by lack of US transparency on COVID origin data https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/03/who-deeply-frustrated-by-lack-of-us-transparency-on-covid-origin-data/?utm_brand=arstechnica by @BethMarieMole#botOriginal tweet : https://nitter.namazso.eu/arstechnica/status/1631744885425405965
       
 (DIR) Post #ATFx3nz7IvZSBNW49o by karadanvers@follow.darn.social
       2023-03-04T01:15:13Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @arstechnica WHO is one to talk shame on WHO for the BS in 2020
       
 (DIR) Post #ATFxHvaxo0kpq8x984 by mjk_4mjk@mastodon.ie
       2023-03-04T01:18:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @arstechnica FBI is the only US agency with a moderate level of confidence that it was a lab leak. Energy Department has a low confidence. The rest of US agencies either believe it was natural origins or not taking a position.
       
 (DIR) Post #ATFxRePSYWqPR5CyPo by GreenFire@climatejustice.social
       2023-03-04T01:19:50Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @arstechnica Until (if ever) China allows transparency it's basically all conspiracy theorizing to speculate on covid's exact origin.
       
 (DIR) Post #ATFywNzNl0XBRJEL4K by atbeaune@social.vivaldi.net
       2023-03-04T01:36:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Would this be the same WHO that disconnects during a pandemic when asked about #Taiwan?John Oliver 'Last Week Tonight'see 11:29https://youtu.be/9Y18-07g39g@arstechnica
       
 (DIR) Post #ATGf1OEEUSBbhmFFr6 by danie10@mastodon.social
       2023-03-04T09:28:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @arstechnica I still vividly remember the 'intelligence' about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that led to a bloody war, and nothing being found. Good enough reason to question the basis and validity of intelligence. A 'suspicion' or 'chance of' is not evidence.